GST Portal, e-Invoice Login & ITC Updates – Taxrealtime

Trending Now

Delhi High Court - Limitation is determined by the dates of the substantive SCN and adjudication ord... Allahabad High Court - Central CGST authority had initiated proceedings first, the subsequent State... Madras High Court - Assessment order set aside for improper service of notices, as uploading notice... Gujarat AAR - Rice Husk Board is a fibre board under HSN 4411, not a particle board; Attracts GST @1...

GST

GST – Madras High Court: Parallel proceedings are not valid on same subject matter, as the SCN was already issued by Central tax officer – Directed Revenue to consider this issue and pass final Order – Writ petition disp...

GST – Allahabad High Court: Proceedings has been initiated solely on the basis of presumption without evidence that goods having been brought into the State using two different vehicles by same e-way bill – As the Vehicl...

GST – New Delhi High Court: SCN must clearly state the allegations that the concerned noticee has to meet – If Department find that they are unable to communicate the allegations, by selecting the options as available on...

GST – Gujarat High Court: Issue of refund withhold due to tag of risky exporter – Held that none of the provisions of the GST law mandate the petitioner to verify the genuineness of the suppliers of the supplier, petitio...

GST – Karnataka High Court: Value printed on the form can be transacted only at the time of redemption of the voucher and not at the time of delivery of vouchers to Petitioner’s client - Therefore, the issuance of vouch...

GST – Allahabad High Court: It is a case of stock transfer and there is no intention on the part of dealer to evade any tax, and minor discrepancy in Part-B of e-way bill pertaining to registration number of vehicle woul...

GST – Jharkhand High Court: Assessment proceedings suffer from serious procedural errors in absence of a proper SCN – Also, summary of Order issued in Form GST DRC-07 does not precede with proper adjudication order, henc...

GST – Allahabad High Court: Order cancelling registration of the petitioner is passed only on the ground that reply to the show cause notice is not given, non-submission of reply to the show cause cannot be a ground for...

GST – New Delhi High Court: In the event, the GST portal cannot be adopted to include further explanation of the reasons for which the proposed action is contemplated, Revenue may consider issuing a physical SCN – Instan...

GST – Jharkhand High Court: Even though Petitioner did not reply to ASMT-10, DRC-01A and SCN, but as the SCN was issued in a format without striking out the irrelevant particulars, the same is vague – Also, summary of or...

GST – AAR Karnataka: Works contract services supplied to railways such as construction of rail under bridge and construction of tunnels is taxable @ 18%; Works contract services involving predominantly earth work (more t...

GST – AAR Karnataka: Jaggery of all types including Cane Jaggery (gur), Palmyra Jaggery, pre-packaged and labelled; Khandsari Sugar, pre-packaged and labeled is exigible to GST @ 5% which means all types of jaggery which...

GST – AAR Karnataka: Supply of ready to eat food by way of catering to Pre-University College i.e. educational institution is exempt from GST [Order attached]

GST – AAR Karnataka: Works contract service provided to Bio Centers, Department of Horticulture and Center of excellence are not exempted from GST; Providing Manpower service like data entry operator, security to Horticu...

GST – Allahabad High Court: Revenue has not recorded any finding as to how the explanation accorded by the Petitioner cannot be accepted, and the trade practice of purchase and sale of battery is according to weight and...

GST – Madras High Court: Pursuant to detention, the consequential order was passed by Revenue beyond the period of seven days from the date of service of notice on the petitioner which is contrary to section 129(3), henc...

GST – Jharkhand High Court: As the show cause notice was issued without striking irrelevant particulars which does not fulfill the ingredients of a proper show cause notice hence it leads to violation of principles of na...

GST- AAAR Maharashtra: The appellant manufactures the tool as per the requirements of foreign customer and retain it to use in manufacture and supply of camshafts - The appellant raises the tax invoice for this tool to t...

GST - AAAR Maharashtra: The Appellant (SEZ unit) is not required to pay any GST under RCM on the services received like renting of immovable property, advocate service, from either SEEPZ SEZ or DTA supplier for carrying...

GST - Calcutta High Court: As the Petitioner has not deliberately filed the Appeal beyond the condonable period (3 months plus 30 days), hence delay in filing appeal is condoned and directed Appellate authority to consid...

‹ Previous Page Next Page ›

Short Reels

Linkedin (English)

Instagram (Hindi)

News Updates

Get complete access to news updates - @299 + GST for 6 months / @499 + GST for 1 Year

Get in Touch

[email protected]

+91 7291044154

+91 7849813442