Top GST News, Case Laws & Circulars | Taxrealtime

Trending Now

GST Advisory: Pre-deposit paid via DRC-03 is not considered for appeal filing unless linked to deman... Bombay High Court: GST authorities cannot seize cash under Section 67 without proper “reason to beli... Karnataka High Court: ITC cannot be blocked under Rule 86A for supplier’s actions when alleged fraud... Madras High Court : Demand order exceeding the amount proposed in the Show Cause Notice violates Sec...

Top Stories

GST Advisory: Pre-deposit paid via DRC-03 is not considered for appeal filing unless linked to demand through DRC-03A [Advisory attached]

Bombay High Court: GST authorities cannot seize cash under Section 67 without proper “reason to believe” and legal backing, making such seizure is illegal [Order attached]

Karnataka High Court: ITC cannot be blocked under Rule 86A for supplier’s actions when alleged fraud is by the recipient [Order attached]

Madras High Court : Demand order exceeding the amount proposed in the Show Cause Notice violates Section 75(7) and is legally impermissible [Order attached]

Gauhati High Court: Mandatory 10% pre deposit cannot be waived where the Section 74 order confirming wrongful ITC availment contains reasoned findings [Order attached]

Allahabad High Court: Appellate order without considering the key contentions raised by the taxpayer regarding the reliability of the laboratory report and the sampling process is invalid [Order attached]

Allahabad High Court: Adjudication order demanding interest not quantified in the SCN is beyond the scope of the notice and liable to be set aside [Order attached]

Madras High Court upheld the validity of Rule 39(1)(a) of the CGST/TNGST Rules requiring Input Service Distributors to distribute ITC in the same month as the underlying invoice [Order attached]

Madhya Pradesh High Court: IGST paid even prior to struck down of GST levy on ocean freight by the Supreme Courton must be refunded since the levy was itself declared unconstitutional [Order attached]

Gujarat High Court : Heavy penalty under Section 129 cannot be imposed merely for E-way bill expiry when goods are meant for export being zero-rated supplies with no tax liability [Order attached]

Rajasthan High Court: Order against a non-existent company post-amalgamation is void, and its GST registration is deemed cancelled upon merger intimation [Order attached]

Kerala High Court: Under amended GST law, goods detained for confiscation under Section 130 cannot be provisionally released by paying fine in lieu of confiscation; Release is permissible only after a final confiscation...

Next Page ›

News Updates

News Updates

Get complete access to news updates - @299 + GST for 6 months / @499 + GST for 1 Year

Get in Touch

info@taxrealtime.in

+91 7291044154

+91 7849813442