Excise – Cestat New Delhi: The appellant is entitled to the Cenvat credit for the service tax paid on rent-a-cab services; the “place of removal” continues to be the seller’s premises whether it be the factory gate or any other place relatable to the seller: Appeal allowed.

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
27-Jul-2022 10:22:37
Order Date – 26 July 2022
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s Jindal Tubular (India) Limited, was issued a SCN on July 19, 2018 for the period from April 2015 to March 2017 whereby an amount of Rs. 7,35,07,617/- was demanded under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act which the appellant collected from its customer M/s Navayuga Engineering Company Limited.
- Also demanded Rs. 4,13,596/-, being the Cenvat credit of rent-a-cab services used by the employees and customers of the appellant for business purposes on the ground that it is not an “input service” for the appellant and an amount of Rs. 3,95,550/- demanded towards central excise duty on the freight charges paid for transport of goods from the appellant’s premises to the customer’s premises when goods were sold on FOR basis to the customers by the appellant.
- Aggrieved the appellant filed an appeal.
Issue –
- Whether the demands of the commissioner are justifiable?
Order –
- Demand u/s 11D of the Central Excise Act –
The Tribunal observed that the appellant has collected the amount as representing Excise duty from its customers which does not appear to be the case from the agreement and from the invoices. Therefore, this part of the demand cannot be sustained and needs to be set aside.
- Cenvat Credit of rent-a-cab services –
The Tribunal following the judgment of HC of Gujarat in Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Vadodara Vs. Transpek Industry Ltd. held that the appellant is entitled to the Cenvat credit for the service tax paid on rent-a-cab services.
- Freight charges paid for transport of goods to the customer’s premises –
The Tribunal relied on SC case CCE, Nagpur Vs. Ispat Industries in which it was held that the ‘place of removal’ in every case has to be only the place relatable to the seller and it cannot be the buyer’s premises even though the sale may be completed at the buyer’s premises when goods are sold on FOR destination basis. Therefore, the demand is not sustainable.
In view of the above, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.
Tags
##Excise# #Input Tax Credit#
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation