GST – Jharkhand High Court: SCN issued without indicating specific contravention are vague; Summary SCN in Form DRC-01 could not substitute the requirement of a proper show cause notice.
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
26-Jul-2022 11:38:57
Order Date: 11 July 2022
Facts:
- The Petitioner Pawan Kumar singh and others, is engaged in civil construction/ sale of electric goods, etc.
- Petitioners has sought quashing of the show-cause notice issued under section 73 of JGST Act, 2017. Petitioners has also laid challenge to the Summary of show-cause notice issued in Form GST DRC-01 and also challenged the Summary of the Order issued in Form GST DRC-07. The show-cause notices and Summary of the show-cause notices in Form GST DRC-01 mentions the charge i.e. difference between GSTR-3B and 2A.
- The Petitioner submitted that there is no specific denial of the plea that no penalty of 100% of the tax dues can be levied in a proceeding under section 73(1) in terms of section 73(9) of the Act, 2017.
Issue:
- Whether the show cause notice u/s 73 of JGST and summary of the show cause notices in form GST DRC-01 and summary of order in form GST DRC-07 was issued in compliance with provisions of the GST Act?
Order:
- The Court observed that the notices under section 73(1) of the CGST Act in the respective writ petitions are in the standard format and neither any particulars have been struck off, nor specific contravention have been indicated to enable the petitioners to furnish a proper reply to defend themselves. The show-cause notices can therefore, be termed as vague.
- The court further observe that the Levy of penalty of 100% of tax dues reflected in the Summary of the Orders contained in Form GST DRC-07 are also in the teeth of the provisions of Section 73(9) of the CGST Act, wherein while passing an adjudication order, the Proper Officer can levy penalty up to 10% of tax dues only. The infirmity clearly shows non-application of mind on the part of the Deputy Commissioner - Proceedings also suffer from violation of principles of natural justice and the procedure prescribed under section 73 of the CGST Act and are in teeth of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case M/s NKAS SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED.
- Accordingly, the impugned show-cause notices and Summary of the Show Cause Notices and Summary of Orders contained in Form GST DRC-07 are quashed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation