GST – Madras High Court: CGST Act mandates that a personal hearing be given either if such hearing is requested for or if an order adverse to the assessee is proposed to be issued; Even after petitioner expressly requested for a personal hearing, it was not granted - Order set aside [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
01-Mar-2024 06:08:33
Order Date – 19 February 2024
Parties: Tvl. Liugong India Pvt. Limited Vs State Tax Officer, Oragadam Assessment Circle, Assistant Commissioner (ST), Oragadam Assessment Circle and State Tax Officer, Office of the Deputy Commissioner (ST)
Facts –
- The Petitioner, Tvl. Liugong India Pvt. Limited,is a construction equipment manufacturer and pursuant to an audit of the petitioner's books of accounts under Section 65 of applicable GST laws, a show cause notice dated 29.09.2023 was issued to the petitioner. Such notice was replied to on 24.10.2023 and a personal hearing was requested for.
- The impugned order came to be issued on 29.12.2023 without providing a personal hearing to the petitioner.
Issue –
- Whether the order issued without providing personal hearing is proper?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observe that by reply dated 24.10.2023, the petitioner expressly requested for a personal hearing. Such personal hearing was not granted.
- Further it appears that the demand was confirmed entirely on the basis that the petitioner did not produce payment details although the petitioner had submitted a trade payables ageing report indicating that none of the payments to the petitioner's vendors were made beyond 180 days.
- Therefore, the impugned order dated 29.12.2023 is quashed and the matter is remanded for reconsideration. The assessing officer is directed to provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, including a personal hearing.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation