- Home
- General Issues
- Offences and Penalties
- Normal / Extended penalty
- Whether penalty can be imposed if the issue involves interpretation of law ?
Whether penalty can be imposed if the issue involves interpretation of law ?
Issue Favourable to Tax Payer ?:- yes
Held - As regards the invocation of extended period, we find that for the period 21.06.2006 to 30.11.2009, the show cause notice was issued on
03.06.2010 wherein the extended period was invoked. We find that the issue is a neat question of law involving interpretation whether the same is falling under Commercial Training or Coaching Service and it is also observed that the appellant had a bonafide belief being a very small servic.....
Issue Favourable to Tax Payer ?:- yes
Held - The issue on merit is whether there is levy of service tax on reverse charge mechanism on the service received from the overseas. This
issue has undergone litigation in various cases before various forums. Finally, the hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Indian National Ship
Owners Association (supra) held that the levy of service tax is not legal on the said service prior to 18.04.2006 on the ground that Section 66.....
Issue Favourable to Tax Payer ?:- yes
Held - I would like to gainfully refer to the decision of the Tribunal, in the case of KUNNATH TEXTILES Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUS. & C. EX., COCHIN [2013 (294) E.L.T. 308 (Tri. - Bang.)] wherein in a similar set of facts, the Tribunal held as under:
“After giving careful consideration to the submissions, we are of the view that, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the plea for vacating the pena.....
Issue Favourable to Tax Payer ?:- yes
Held - In the present case it needs to be noted that paragraph 8 of the notice, reproduced, above merely mentions that the extended period of five years was being invoked as the assessee suppressed the facts from the department. The show cause notice does not allege that the suppression was with an intention to evade payment of Service Tax.
The Commissioner completely failed to appreciate that the extended period of five years could have.....
Issue Favourable to Tax Payer ?:- yes
Held - I find that the carrying of baggage by the appellant Airlines is incidental to the service being ‘transport of passengers by Air' and the same is classifiable under Section 65(105)(zzn). There is no separate contract in the facts of the case for transport of goods (excess baggage). More particularly, in the case of agreement of transport of passengers by Air, there is no element of transport of unaccompanied goods. Excess baggage char.....
Issue Favourable to Tax Payer ?:- yes
Held - The period involved in this appeal is prior to 10-9-2004. The Show Cause Notice was issued on 20-4-2006. The Appellant is paying service tax from 10-9-2004. This matter relates to scope of the entry for “Business Auxiliary Services”. There was considerable doubt about its coverage because of the very nature of the entry. There are contrary decisions of the Tribunal in the matter. In most of the decisions like Bridgestone Financial S.....
- Whether reimbursement of expenses is leviable to GST?
- Whether input tax credit is admissible if invoice/debit note does not appear in Form GSTR-2A/2B or tax is not paid by supplier ?
- Whether marketing and sales promotion services to customers located outside India is intermediary or export of services ?
- Whether order / show cause notice is valid if passed without pre-show cause notice consultation or GST DRC-01 (summary SCN) or GST DRC-01A (tax intimation notice) ?
- Whether recovery proceedings can be initiated if assessee is willing to file an appeal ?
- Whether input tax credit can be transferred to the transferee entity in case of an inter-state business transfer ?
- Whether interest is payable for the period during which the reply to the deficiency memo remains pending ?
- Whether combined show cause notice can be issued covering multiple financial years ?
- Whether tax can be recovered by Department without prior intimation in Form DRC-01D ?
- Whether a penalty equal to 200% of the tax amount can be demanded in case of detention or seizure of goods ?