- Home
- General Issues
- Offences and Penalties
- Normal / Extended penalty
- Whether penalty can be invoked if there was a bona fide doubt about chargeability of tax ?
Whether penalty can be invoked if there was a bona fide doubt about chargeability of tax ?
Issue Favourable to Tax Payer ?:- yes
Held - Extended period of limitation cannot be invoked as the Appellant did not suppress any fact with intent to evade duty and issue involves interpretation of law. No corroborative evidence has been put forward by the department to support that there was a deliberate attempt on the part of the Appellant to suppress the material facts with an intent to evade payment of tax.
Everything was disclosed to the department at the time of .....
Issue Favourable to Tax Payer ?:- yes
Held - At the infancy stage of implementation of law there appears to have been confusion as to taxability. In these circumstances, the invocation of larger period of limitation is not sustainable. Further, in view of, no positive act, on the part of the appellant penalties are not imposable upon them. Therefore, we set aside the demand for the larger period and the penalties imposed.
.....
Issue Favourable to Tax Payer ?:- yes
Held - It is seen that the Tribunal in an identical issue in the case of Wings Group of Companies vs. Commr. of S.T., Bangalore, reported in 2008 (11) STR 63 (Tri.-Bang.) while deciding the stay application observed that activity of arranging loan and receiving commission would come within the purview of 'Business Support Services' effective from 1.5.2006 and not under "Business Auxiliary Services". Thus, it is clear that there was doubt on th.....
Issue Favourable to Tax Payer ?:- yes
Held - The appellants had a bona fide belief that Attars were not chargeable to duty and the belief was based on the fact that the other manufacturers, who were supplying Attars to M/s. Dhariwal Industries Ltd., were not paying any duty on the Attars manufactured by them.
In the present case, there could be no such awareness attributed to the appellants. The fact that the other suppliers to Dhariwal Industries Ltd. were not being c.....
Issue Favourable to Tax Payer ?:- yes
Held - When the Business Auxiliary Services had just been brought within the service tax net w. e. f. 1.7.2003 and, therefore, possibility that person providing this service may not be aware of its scope and, in view of the fact that the appellants have paid the admitted amount as soon as non-payment of service tax on the commission received from the banks/Financial Institutions was pointed out, we are of the view that consolidated penalty of .....
- Whether reimbursement of expenses is leviable to GST?
- Whether input tax credit is admissible if invoice/debit note does not appear in Form GSTR-2A/2B or tax is not paid by supplier ?
- Whether marketing and sales promotion services to customers located outside India is intermediary or export of services ?
- Whether order / show cause notice is valid if passed without pre-show cause notice consultation or GST DRC-01 (summary SCN) or GST DRC-01A (tax intimation notice) ?
- Whether recovery proceedings can be initiated if assessee is willing to file an appeal ?
- Whether input tax credit can be transferred to the transferee entity in case of an inter-state business transfer ?
- Whether interest is payable for the period during which the reply to the deficiency memo remains pending ?
- Whether combined show cause notice can be issued covering multiple financial years ?
- Whether tax can be recovered by Department without prior intimation in Form DRC-01D ?
- Whether a penalty equal to 200% of the tax amount can be demanded in case of detention or seizure of goods ?