Excise, VAT & CST Case Laws, CENVAT Rulings & Updates | Taxrealtime

TAX REAL TIME

QUICK TAX SOLUTIONS

Register Sign in |

Trending

GST - Supreme Court over rules Gujarat High Court judgement holding once tax burden has been passed,... GST - Madras High Court: Retrospective insertion of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) restores eligibility fo... GST - First Landmark Order by GSTAT Principal Bench – Mere mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B does... GST - Gauhati High Court: Summary SCN (DRC-01) cannot replace a SCN under Section 73; Unsigned attac...

Excise / VAT / CST

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: Any amount deposited as a pre-deposit for maintaining the Appeal has to be refunded and the provisions of section 11B will not be applicable – If refund is not made within three months from the...

Excise – Cestat Kolkata: Merely basis third party’s statement without cross examination, demand cannot be made as there is no other evidence in the impugned order to show that the Appellant has willfully suppressed the f...

Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Non-transfer of unutilized cenvat credit is as good as reversal of Cenvat, hence refund cannot be rejected on ground of Cenvat is not debited from the account – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Excise – Jharkhand High Court: For claim for rebate of duty, the period of limitation prescribed under Section 11B shall have to be applied and applicable – Current refund claim being filed after 1 year hence are time ba...

Excise – Cestat Kolkata: Insistence of penalty from the Accountant, when the main party has settled the issue under SVLDRS, defeats the spirit of the scheme itself, hence penalty imposed on the Accountant, is set aside –...

Excise – Cestat Mumbai: Cenvat Credit of ‘insurance service’ paid on premium for continuation of medical cover for retiring employees under the special scheme is a Input Service and hence credit is allowed – Appeal allow...

Excise – Cestat Mumbai: Bought-out items received at the site and used in the erection of boilers are not liable to be added to the assessable value of boilers as these were not even brought into the premises of appellan...

Excise – Cestat Chennai: Appellant has to be given an option to pay 25% penalty if they are paying duty along with interest within 30 days of receipt of the order – Appeal allowed partly [Order attached]

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: Entries in a Note Book recovered from the premises is not a reliable piece of evidence, statement of Transport Company employee is not admissible evidence, as he was not produced for cross exam...

Excise – Calcutta High court: As the appellant approached the authority and filed the requisite Industrial promotion incentive application in a manual format on 04.11.2012, it would be incorrect to state that the appella...

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: As Central Excise duty was not collected in addition to the sale price, in claim of Area based exemption, the appellant shall be entitled to benefit of calculation of duty on cum-duty-price - A...

Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Since the appellant does not have ISI certification to conform the BIS Standard, the appellant is not eligible for SSI exemption in respect of power driven pumps - Appellant is entitled for cum...

‹ Previous Page

News Updates

Get complete access to news updates - @299 + GST for 6 months / @499 + GST for 1 Year

Get in Touch

info@taxrealtime.in

+91 7291044154

+91 7849813442