Excise, VAT & CST Case Laws, CENVAT Rulings & Updates | Taxrealtime

TAX REAL TIME

QUICK TAX SOLUTIONS

Register Sign in |

Trending

GST - Supreme Court over rules Gujarat High Court judgement holding once tax burden has been passed,... GST - Madras High Court: Retrospective insertion of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) restores eligibility fo... GST - First Landmark Order by GSTAT Principal Bench – Mere mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B does... GST - Gauhati High Court: Summary SCN (DRC-01) cannot replace a SCN under Section 73; Unsigned attac...

Excise / VAT / CST

Excise - Bombay High Court: Without evidence, the accusations of clandestine removal cannot be confirmed merely based on a statement of few transporters that goods were not transported to Appellant - Appeal dismissed [At...

Excise-Cestat Kolkata: Question of eligibility of Cenvat Credit basis supplementary invoice issued by the supplier pursuant to payment of duty that became recoverable on account of non-levy or short levy by reasons of fr...

Excise - Cestat New Delhi: Period of refund filing application in one year as per Section 11B(B)(ec) is from date of decision of Hon’ble High Court and not the date of Final Order of CESTAT, as Department filed an appeal...

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: Procedural lapses on the part of the appellant would not be sufficient to confiscate the goods and be given the colour of clandestine removal with intent of evading duty without any corroborati...

Excise – Cestat Kolkata: Appellant is entitled for refund of excess duty paid inadvertently, as there is no case of unjust enrichment which is evident by undisputed CA certificate: Appeal allowed. [Order Attached dated 1...

Excise – Cestat Kolkata: Iron, Steel items and Cement used for erection of foundation and support structures would come within the ambit of the definition of “input” as it satisfies the “user test”: Cenvat Credit allowed...

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: Though the Appellant exported exempted goods without payment of duty but the same were not under bond or letter of undertaking, hence no refund of Cenvat Credit is admissible. [Order Attached d...

Excise- Cestat New Delhi: By-product or incidental product cannot be said to be inputs as such which by any stretch of imagination cannot be said to attract the provisions of Rule 3(5) requiring reversal of Cenvat Credit...

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: Where an order for refund under section 11B attains finality, the refund allowed would be outside the scope of an “erroneous refund” subsequently – Recovery of the refund is not permissible [Or...

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: Without corroborative evidence no demand can be made by alleging clandestine removal - Third party evidence cannot be relied upon to confirm the allegations as that of clandestine removal - App...

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: Without making inquiry with the buyers of finished goods, transportation, and theoretical basis of input output ratio do not lead to conclusion of clandestine manufacture and removal; Impositio...

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: Question of eligibility of Cenvat Credit without receipt of invoice – Held that Revenue has not complied procedure under section 9D by not allowing cross examination and the statements are not...

‹ Previous Page

News Updates

Get complete access to news updates - @299 + GST for 6 months / @499 + GST for 1 Year

Get in Touch

info@taxrealtime.in

+91 7291044154

+91 7849813442