Login
Home
GST
News Updates
GST Law
Free
GST ISSUES
GST Rates
New
Login
X
Acts
Rules
Forms
Notifications
Circulars
Instructions / Guidelines
Orders
Finance Act (GST)
Trending Now
Karnataka High Court: GST authorities can use material collected by other commissionerates, especial...
Gujarat High Court : ITC can be transferred across states after amalgamation; GST portal restriction...
Orissa High Court: Limitation for filing an appeal begins from the date of communication of order, n...
Karnataka High Court: Concessional benefits for exports not available when goods sent to third party...
Home
Excise / VAT / CST
Excise, VAT & CST Case Laws and Tribunal Judgments
Excise Duty Refund & Interest Appeals
CENVAT Credit Disputes – Case Summaries
Show Cause Notices Under Central Excise
VAT Assessment & Penalty Judgments
Latest CST Rulings from Tribunals
Excise / VAT / CST
Excise – Calcutta High Court: Issue of difference between installed production as declared in the ER-7 statement and the ER-1 return – Held that as department has not been able to establish the charge of clandestine remo...
Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Penalty is not payable by the employee Director of the Company as he neither availed Cenvat credit nor is the beneficiary of Cenvat credit – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Excise - Cestat Ahmedabad – As the Appellant M/s. Himalaya Equipments and M/s. Himalaya Engineers & Manufacturers, though have different names but owned by same partners therefore their value will be clubbed for computat...
Excise – Cestat New Delhi: Once the appellant SEZ unit is found to be eligible to claim the refund, the substantive conditions are complied with and the condition of time limit for making the claim being only a procedura...
Excise – Tripura High Court: Issue of refund sanctioned on education cess and higher education cess collected - As the ground raised by the review petitioner is not satisfactory, the prayer made in review petition stands...
Excise – Supreme Court: Sale of footwear to defense/paramilitary is not a retail sale as per the Act, there exists no mandate of law herein to affix an MRP on the goods sold, and hence the said impugned transaction canno...
Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad – Appellant is entitled for CENVAT credit in respect of Cement, MS angles, Channels, Beams, Bars, etc. used for foundation of plant and machinery in his factory basis the Charted Engineer’s Cert...
Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Post issuance of SCN, the Appellant is allowed to make the delayed payment of duty by utilizing CENVAT credit and is not required to pay in cash - The matter is no longer a res-integra – Appeal...
Excise: Cestat Mumbai - The goods, in issue, even though it is used outside the factory, since it is used in or in relation to the manufacture of final product, the credit is admissible; Availment of Cenvat credit has be...
Excise – Cestat Mumbai: Notifications enhancing the rate of duty would be effective from the date and time of its publication in its Official Gazette and not from the date of its issue - Uploading in the website of the C...
Excise – Cestat Chennai: Appellants are eligible to get the concessional rate of duty as per the Notification in regard to finished goods since it is a case of de-bonding and not DTA sale - Refund of excess duty paid on...
Excise – Cestat Chennai: In case inter-unit transfer the actual cost of production (100% of the cost of production), of the raw material procured from one unit [excluding the notional loading under Rule 8 – 15% / 10%] is...
Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Buyer’s premises cannot, in law, be a “place of removal” - Merely because the appellant is under obligation to deliver the goods at the buyer’s premises, the place of removal which is a factory...
Excise – Cestat Kolkata: Iron and steel, cement, welding electrodes etc. used in the factory in the manufacture of storage tank and also for pollution control system are Inputs and are eligible for CENVAT credit – Appeal...
Karnataka VAT – Supreme Court of India: Mere production of the invoices or the payment made by cheques is not enough and cannot be said to be discharging the burden of proof - In the absence of cogent material like furni...
Excise – Cestat Chennai: There is consensus ad idem to transfer the ownership along with assets and liabilities to the lessee unit - Thus, the rejection of the request to transfer Cenvat credit balance to the newly trans...
Excise – Cestat Chennai: Cost of free supply material received from buyer is not to be included in the assessable value, hence demand is not sustainable on ground of under valuation – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Excise – Cestat Mumbai: MS Angles, Beams, Plates, channels etc. were treated as capital goods and CENVAT credit is allowed on the same – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Excise – Cestat Chennai: Input service credit distributed by ISD is not inadmissible on the pretext that invoices did not contain all the particulars as required in terms of Rule 4A; There is no revenue loss to exchequer...
Excise – Cestat New Delhi: On final fabrication and installation, the Retail Visual Identity forms part of the immovable property at the retail outlet and does not result in manufacture of goods, hence excise duty is not...
‹ Previous Page
Short Reels
Linkedin (English)
Instagram (Hindi)
News Updates
GST Advisory: Pre-deposit paid via DRC-03 is not considered ...
GSTN has launched Form GST REG-32 on the portal to enable el...
GSTN issued FAQs to clarify significant reporting and auto-p...
GSTN issued advisory to intimate Form GSTR-9/9C for FY 2024-...
View All
Subscribe Now