Login
Home
GST
News Updates
GST Law
Free
GST ISSUES
GST Rates
New
Login
X
Acts
Rules
Forms
Notifications
Circulars
Instructions / Guidelines
Orders
Finance Act (GST)
Trending Now
GST Advisory: Pre-deposit paid via DRC-03 is not considered for appeal filing unless linked to deman...
Bombay High Court: GST authorities cannot seize cash under Section 67 without proper “reason to beli...
Karnataka High Court: ITC cannot be blocked under Rule 86A for supplier’s actions when alleged fraud...
Madras High Court : Demand order exceeding the amount proposed in the Show Cause Notice violates Sec...
Home
GST
GST Portal Updates, ITC Tools, and e-Invoice Access
Latest e-Invoice Login Guide via CBIC Portal
How to Claim ITC under GST: Process & Rules
Track GST Payments and View Account Balance
Recent Changes in GST Portal Navigation
GST
GST - Delhi High Court: Court hold all the proceedings initiated under deleted Rule 96(10) CGST lapse automatically and cannot be continued by the department ; Petitioners can continue receiving IGST refund benefits [Ord...
GST – Supreme Court: Leasing of Company managed residential dwelling, used as hostel, for students and and working professionals is exempt [Order attached]
Allahabad High Court: Penalty under Section 129 quashed for wrong PIN code, holding minor clerical errors cannot justify seizure or detention when all transport documents are valid [Order attached]
GST - Karnataka High Court: Minor mismatch in description of goods in transport documents cannot justify detention or penalty under Section 129 without evidence of tax evasion [Order attached]
GST – Bombay High Court: Mere mismatch between shipping bills and invoices cannot lead to rejection of ITC refund under zero-rated supplies [Order attached]
GST – Allahabad High Court: Since goods were transported with valid invoice and e-way bill, penalty for infringement falls under Section 129(1)(a) and not Section 129(1)(b) [Order attached]
GST – Calcutta High Court condones 93-days delay in filing appeal; Reliance on consultant for critical tax filings is a sufficient cause under Section 107 [order attached]
GST - Allahabad High: Section 75(7) expressly prohibits confirming liability beyond what is stated in the SCN [Order attached]
GST - Allahabad High Court: Excess stock found in survey must be assessed only under Sections 73 or 74 and not under Section 130 [Order attached]
GST – Allahabad High Court: No penalty for non-updation of destination address as “additional place of business”, as no mismatch in goods or documents accompany e-way bill [Order attached]
GST – Allahabad High Court: E-way bill generated after interception does not cure the violation; No evidence of glitch - Penalty upheld [Order attached]
GST – West Bengal AAR: Without a valid proof to establish applicant's identify, application of advance ruling is rejected [Order attached]
GST – Allahabad High Court: Since the suppliers registration was restored, treating purchases as from an unregistered/bogus dealer is illegal - Proceedings under Section 74 quashed [Order attached]
GST – Allahabad High Court: No penalty is leviable for delayed unloading under an expired e-way bill when the goods reached the destination on time [Order attached]
GST - Allahabad High Court: Short-loading of goods without evidence of intent to evade tax cannot justify seizure or continuation of Section 129 proceedings [Order attached]
GST - Delhi High Court: A valid SCN must disclose reasons, factual basis, and grounds for invoking Section 73; a template notice is legally insufficient - Quashes ex-parte GST assessment [Order attached]
GST - Delhi High Court: No further penalty leviable once tax and interest is paid under Section 74(5) prior to issuance of show cause notice [Order attached]
GST - Allahabad High Court: Non-filling of Part B due to a technical error cannot attract penalty under Section 129(3) without specific findings of tax-evasion intent [Order attached]
GST - Gujarat AAR: Fusible interlining cotton fabrics classifiable under Chapter 52 and not under 59 [Order attached]
GST – Allahabad High Court holds taxable event of works contract is its execution, which is in pre-GST regime; Reliance on Form 26AS to demand GST held invalid [order attached]
‹ Previous Page
Short Reels
Linkedin (English)
Instagram (Hindi)
News Updates
GST Advisory: Pre-deposit paid via DRC-03 is not considered ...
GSTN has launched Form GST REG-32 on the portal to enable el...
GSTN issued FAQs to clarify significant reporting and auto-p...
GSTN issued advisory to intimate Form GSTR-9/9C for FY 2024-...
View All
Subscribe Now
Issue under GST
×
Email
Mobile No.
Message