Login
Home
GST
News Updates
GST Law
Free
GST ISSUES
GST Rates
New
Articles
New
Login
Acts
Rules
Forms
Notifications
Circulars
Instructions / Guidelines
Orders
Finance Act (GST)
Trending Now
Himachal Pradesh High Court - When a matter is remanded for fresh adjudication, the appellate author...
Meghalaya High Court - GST disputes on classification, exemption, and taxability should generally be...
Gauhati High Court - Bona fide purchaser cannot be denied ITC merely because the supplier failed to...
Gauhati High Court - ITC cannot be denied to a bona fide purchaser merely because the supplier faile...
Home
GST
GST Portal Updates, ITC Tools, and e-Invoice Access
Latest e-Invoice Login Guide via CBIC Portal
How to Claim ITC under GST: Process & Rules
Track GST Payments and View Account Balance
Recent Changes in GST Portal Navigation
GST
Karnataka High Court: Section 54 limitation is mandatory, but present genuine delayed refund claim can still be allowed through writ jurisdiction under Article 226 with safeguards [Order attached]
Bombay High Court: Vouchers are merely instruments creating obligation to accept payment, and hence cannot be treated as supply of goods or services [Order attached]
AAR Tamil Nadu - Supply of medicines to inpatients is exempt as part of composite healthcare services, but supply to outpatients is taxable [Order attached]
High Court of Andhra Pradesh: Only Customs authorities (not GST officers) have jurisdiction to assess and levy IGST on imported goods; Action by State GST officers without jurisdiction [Order attached]
High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh: Notice unsustainable in law as it is premised on an incorrect assertion that a CAG audit was conducted, whereas no such audit actually took place - SCN quashed [Order attache...
High Court of Andhra Pradesh: Passing through State GST officers cannot detain/confiscate goods in interstate (IGST) transit merely for valuation issues or when they lack jurisdiction over the taxpayer [Order attached]
Karnataka High Court: GST authorities can use material collected by other commissionerates, especially in multi-state tax evasion investigations; SCN stays valid if based on relevant evidence, even from cross-jurisdictio...
Gujarat High Court : ITC can be transferred across states after amalgamation; GST portal restrictions cannot override the law [Order attached]
Orissa High Court: Limitation for filing an appeal begins from the date of communication of order, not from when the assessee claims knowledge; Writ dismissed being Appeals not filed within time limits [Order attached]
Karnataka High Court: Concessional benefits for exports not available when goods sent to third party manufacturer for exports and not to the mechant exporter [Order attached]
Gauhati High Court: Summary SCN cannot replace a proper SCN, and absence of hearing and authentication makes the entire demand invalid [Order attached]
Gauhati High Court: GST demand fails when issued without a proper SCN, without signing and authentication, even if summary forms are uploaded [Order attached]
Delhi High Court : Refund delayed is justice denied: Courts expect GST orders to be implemented, not revisited; Directed to process refund within 3 weeks [Order attached]
Delhi High Court : Relying on Ambika Traders, GST law permits consolidation of multiple financial years in a single SCN; Writ not maintainable where GST Appellate Remedy Exists [Order attached]
Gujarat High Court : omission of Rule 96(10) applies to all pending proceedings and not just only future cases; Petitioner entitled to refund [Order attached]
Madras High Court: Extended Limitation not Invokable for interpretational disputes regarding claim of exemption on “Branded vs Unbranded” Goods [Order attached]
Bombay High Court: GST authorities cannot seize cash under Section 67 without proper “reason to believe” and legal backing, making such seizure is illegal [Order attached]
Karnataka High Court: ITC cannot be blocked under Rule 86A for supplier’s actions when alleged fraud is by the recipient [Order attached]
Madras High Court : Demand order exceeding the amount proposed in the Show Cause Notice violates Section 75(7) and is legally impermissible [Order attached]
Gauhati High Court: Mandatory 10% pre deposit cannot be waived where the Section 74 order confirming wrongful ITC availment contains reasoned findings [Order attached]
‹ Previous Page
Next Page ›
Short Reels
Linkedin (English)
Instagram (Hindi)
News Updates
GSTN is strengthening e-Way Bill ecosystem by making “Ship...
GSTAT has extended relaxed and simplified appeal filing proc...
GST News: Due to GST Portal Glitch, Govt Likely to Extend Ma...
GST News - Advisory issued regarding difficulty in filing ap...
View All
Subscribe Now