GST – Gujarat AAR: ITC on IGST paid for imports valid even if payment to foreign supplier delayed beyond 180 days [Order attached]


In a recent ruling dated September 6, 2025, the Gujarat Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) addressed a query from M/s Priya Holdings Pvt. Ltd. regarding the eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) paid for imported goods. The company, involved in trading ferrous and non-ferrous metal scrap, sometimes delays payments to foreign suppliers beyond 180 days due to commercial agreements, in line with FEMA and RBI guidelines. They sought clarification on whether such delays necessitate the reversal of ITC as per the provisions of the CGST Rules, 2017.
The AAR examined whether the ITC of IGST paid at import needs to be reversed if the payment to the foreign supplier is delayed. It concluded that since the IGST is paid directly to the government at the customs port, rather than to the supplier, the condition under the proviso to Section 16(2) of the CGST Act does not apply. The ruling emphasized that the bill of entry, used during customs, is the valid document for ITC entitlement, not the supplier's invoice.
Thus, the AAR ruled that the ITC on IGST paid for imports remains valid even if the payment to the foreign supplier is delayed beyond 180 days, as long as the transaction adheres to FEMA and RBI regulations. This decision underscores that the remittance of tax to the government ensures ITC eligibility, irrespective of payment timelines to overseas vendors.
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
10-Oct-2025 20:51:45
In a recent ruling dated September 6, 2025, the Gujarat Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) addressed a query from M/s Priya Holdings Pvt. Ltd. regarding the eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) paid for imported goods. The company, involved in trading ferrous and non-ferrous metal scrap, sometimes delays payments to foreign suppliers beyond 180 days due to commercial agreements, in line with FEMA and RBI guidelines. They sought clarification on whether such delays necessitate the reversal of ITC as per the provisions of the CGST Rules, 2017.
The AAR examined whether the ITC of IGST paid at import needs to be reversed if the payment to the foreign supplier is delayed. It concluded that since the IGST is paid directly to the government at the customs port, rather than to the supplier, the condition under the proviso to Section 16(2) of the CGST Act does not apply. The ruling emphasized that the bill of entry, used during customs, is the valid document for ITC entitlement, not the supplier's invoice.
Thus, the AAR ruled that the ITC on IGST paid for imports remains valid even if the payment to the foreign supplier is delayed beyond 180 days, as long as the transaction adheres to FEMA and RBI regulations. This decision underscores that the remittance of tax to the government ensures ITC eligibility, irrespective of payment timelines to overseas vendors.
Order date: 06 Sept 2025
Parties: M/s Priya Holdings Pvt. Ltd., Bhavnagar
Facts –
- The applicant, a trader in ferrous and non-ferrous metal scrap, imports goods from overseas suppliers and pays IGST at the time of import, claiming it as Input Tax Credit (ITC).
- Due to commercial arrangements, payments to foreign suppliers are sometimes made after 180 days in accordance with FEMA/RBI guidelines.
- The applicant sought clarification on whether such delayed payment would require reversal of ITC under second proviso to Section 16(2) read with Rule 37 of the CGST Rules, 2017.
Issue –
- Whether ITC of IGST paid at the time of import needs to be reversed if payment to the foreign supplier is made after 180 days from the date of invoice?
Order –
- The Authority noted that in case of imports, IGST is paid directly to the Government at the customs port, not to the supplier. Thus, the condition under Section 16(2) proviso (which applies to payments made to suppliers) does not apply.
- The bill of entry, not the supplier’s invoice, forms the valid document for ITC entitlement under Section 16(2)(a).
- Since the tax is already remitted to the Government, delayed payment to the overseas vendor does not affect ITC eligibility.
- The AAR therefore ruled that ITC of IGST paid on import of goods remains admissible, even if payment to the foreign supplier is made beyond 180 days, provided the transaction complies with FEMA and RBI norms.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation