Login
Trending Now
GSTAT has extended relaxed and simplified appeal filing procedures on the portal till 31 December 20... Himachal Pradesh High Court: Once either Central or State GST authority initiates adjudicatory proce... Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: While the petitioner claimed hospitalization of his father, t... Bombay High Court - Corporate guarantee issued by a parent company to its subsidiaries without recei...

Recent Service Tax Case Laws and Appeal Outcomes

Export of Services – Judicial Interpretations

Reverse Charge Mechanism: Case Highlights

Cenvat Credit Disputes – Recent Tribunal Rulings

Interest & Penalty in Service Tax Matters
Appeals Allowed & Dismissed – At a Glance

Service Tax

Service Tax – Cestat Mumbai: Once a show cause notice has been issued for the earlier period on certain set of facts, then, on the same set of facts another SCN based on the same/similar set of facts invoking the extende...
Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Amount deposited during investigation is ipso facto pre-deposit and interest is payable on such amount being successful in appeal, from the date of deposit till the date of refund – Appeal...
Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Service tax liability on differential value in comparing Form 26AS/ITR statement and ST-3 returns is set aside as whatever Service tax, if paid by the Appellant, would have been back to ba...
Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Construction of residential Complex services under Jawaharalal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM) is exempt from Service tax – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Service tax – Bombay High Court: There was no service provider or service receiver contract between the parties entered into joint venture for the purpose of levying of Service tax - There is absolutely no mention in th...
Service tax – CBIC issued Notification directing service tax collected on “light-dies” by Directorate General of Lighthouses and Lightships during the period 1st July 2012 to 30th June 2017 are not required to be paid [N...
Service Tax – Cestat New Delhi: Issue whether telecommunication service is Intermediary of exports – Held that when the Input tax refund was confirmed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) then the re-examination of the...
Service tax – Cestat Chennai: As per Section 102, the service provider is eligible for exemption of Service tax only if works contract is entered prior to 01.03.2015, since the instant contract has been entered prior to...
Service tax – Cestat Mumbai: When there is delay in sanctioning the refund, as per provisions of Section 11BB interest is payable on the expiry of period of three months from the date of application – Decisions of Hon'bl...
Service tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Amount received as development charges are nothing but in the form of profit and would not fall under “Real Estate Agent’s Service” and hence Service tax is not leviable – Appeal allowed [...
Service Tax – Cestat New Delhi: Termination fee paid to ZEE Limited towards the transfer of rights as per tripartite agreement, does not amount to rendering any service – No service tax is payable – Appeal allowed [Order...
Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: It is not in dispute that when the amount was paid during investigation no formal protest was launched at the time of the said deposit – Hence, payments made by the petitioner were in the...
Service Tax – Cestat Mumbai: Learned Commissioner ought to have gone into the submissions of the appellant and recorded a finding thereon - Mere recording of conclusion without discussions on submission or case laws has...
Service tax – Cestat Mumbai: Services provided by co-operative society to their members would not be liable to Service tax - Limitation prescribed under Section 11B is not applicable to refund claims for Service Tax paid...
Service tax – Cestat New Delhi: Telecommunication service provided by Respondent (SGIPL) to SingTel located outside India is not an intermediary service, instead qualifies to be Export of Services - SGIPL may have used t...
Service Tax - Cestat Ahmedabad: As there is no element of manpower supply or recruitment of farmers by the appellants to the sugar factory and therefore, services rendered by the appellants cannot be classified under man...
Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: As the appellant has reversed the excess credit availed on capital goods of 50% along with interest, which could have resulted into non issuance of SCN and consequently no penalty should have b...
Service tax – New Delhi High Court: The amount of tax dues confirmed by the original authority in the first round of litigation is only required to be paid by the Petitioner, since the said assessment was accepted by the...
Service tax – Cestat New Delhi: Demand prior to July 2007 is not taxable under “works contract services” - For the period post July 2007, works contracts could be changed only under “Works Contract Service” and as there...
Service tax – Cestat Mumbai: Appellant is, squarely and singularly, responsible for failure to furnish proof of the required availability of credit till the date of write off - Appellant not being demonstrative of substa...
‹ Previous Page Next Page ›
Short Reels

Linkedin (English)

Instagram (Hindi)

News Updates

Get in Touch

info@taxrealtime.in

+91 7291044154

+91 7849813442

Useful Links

About us Terms of use Privacy policy Career Advertise with us Contact us

Copyright © Taxrealtime. All Rights Reserved