GST
TRT-2025-
AAAR Karnataka
Date:-24-02-23
In:-
Issue Favourable to Tax Payer ?:-
Order Date – 24 February 2023
Facts –
- The Applicant, M/s Myntra Designs Pvt Ltd, is engaged in the business of selling of fashion and lifestyle products through the said e-commerce portal. In order to enhance their business, the Appellant proposes to run a loyalty programme where loyalty points will be awarded on the basis of purchases made by the customer on its e-commerce platform. The Appellant through its portal, would make the vouchers and subscription packages available to those customers who wish to redeem the loyalty points earned / accumulated.
- AAR held that the applicant is not eligible to avail input tax credit, in terms of Section 16 of the CGST Act 2017, on the vouchers and subscription packages procured by the applicant from third party vendors that are made available to the eligible customers participating in the loyalty program against the loyalty points earned / accumulated by the said customers, as the input tax credit is not available in terms of Section 17(5)(h) of the CGST Act, 2017.
Issue –
- Whether the applicant is eligible to avail the input tax credit on the vouchers and subscription packages?
Order –
- The AAAR held that Hon'ble Karnataka High Court dated 16-01-2023 in the case of M/s Premier Sales Promotions Pvt Ltd., holding that 'vouchers' are neither goods nor services is to be respected as the law applicable as on date until the decision is stayed or reversed by a higher court on an appeal by the Department
- The primary condition for eligibility to input tax credit is that there should be an inward supply of either goods or services or both on which tax is charged by the supplier. In this case, as held by the Karnataka High Court in the decision, the vouchers are held to be neither goods nor services and cannot be taxed to GST. Therefore, when the vouchers intended to be procured by the Appellant is neither goods nor service, the question of eligibility of input tax credit does not arise.
- AAR ruling upheld.
Download Case Law
