Customs – Cestat Chennai: Non-finalization of bills of entry was without any fault on the part of the Appellant, Adjudicating Authority was correct in taking a lenient view imposing total penalty of Rs.10,000 for 4 BoEs – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
17-Mar-2023 16:26:06
Order Date – 16 March 2023
Parties: M/s. Visa Resources India Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Bhubaneswar
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s. Visa Resources India Limited, has imported 16 consignments under various Bills of Entry during the period 2011-2012 to 2014-2015.
- Show Cause Notice was issued to them under Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations, 2011 seeking as to why penalty should not be imposed on them for non finalization of provisionally assessed Bills of Entry.
- The Adjudicating Authority after going through the facts of the case, imposed a penalty of Rs.10,000/- under Regulation 5 of Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations, 2011 by taking a lenient view. On an appeal filed by the revenue, the Adjudicating Authority imposed penalty @ of 50,000/- for each Bill of Entry.
Issue –
- Whether the appellant is liable to pay penalty under Regulation 5 of the Cu Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations, 2011 or not?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that it is seen that in case of 4 Bills of Entry, the assessment were not finalized without any fault on the part of the Appellant.
- The issue is also covered by the case law of Jai Balaji Industries Ltd. wherein, this Tribunal has held that the department has not been able to establish any deliberate delay or any mala fide intention on the part of the appellant. the adjudicating authority took a fair decision and imposed a nominal penalty of Rs.20,000/ which comes to Rs.2,500/- for each of the remaining 8 Bills of Entry yet to be finalized.
- Hence the appeal is allowed holding that the Adjudicating Authority was correct in taking a lenient view imposing penalty of Rs.10,000/-
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation