CUSTOMS – Cestat Mumbai – Issue of recovery of drawback due to non-receipt of foreign inward remittance – Held that no finding has been recorded by the original authority as to why they had imposed penalty under Section 114, hence penalty cannot sustain – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
01-Mar-2023 11:31:25
Order Date: 27 February 2023
Parties: M/s Rishad Shipping and Clearing Agency Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs (Export)
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s Rishad Shipping and Clearing Agency Pvt. Ltd. had filed two shipping bills on behalf of M/s Shaina Enterprises. An investigation was carried out and it was revealed that the said shipping bills were under the claim of drawback and it was allowed to the exporter.
- It was revealed that foreign inward remittance was not received against the export of goods exported through the above-said two shipping bills. Therefore, the drawback paid was recovered to the tune of Rs.1,44,075/-.
- An SCN was issued to the exporter, the appellant another Custom House Agent. The appellant was imposed with a penalty of Rs.2 lakhs under Section 114(i) and another penalty of Rs.1.0 lakh under Section 117 of the Customs Act.
Issue –
- Whether the appellant is liable to pay the penalty?
Orders –
- The Court found that there is no finding recorded by the original authority as to why the original authority had imposed a penalty under Section 114(i). The original authority without giving any reason has imposed the said penalty.
- The Court stated that the said part of the Order-in-Original is not sustainable. Therefore the penalty of Rs.2.0 lakhs imposed on the appellant under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act is set aside.
- In the above terms, the appeal is partially allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation