Customs – Cestat New Delhi: Mistake can be been rectified at the first available opportunity, and therefore there is no error in allowing the amendment of Bill of Entry under section 149 - Amendment of Bill of Entry allowed from Customs Tariff Heading from 25 to 28 – Appeal allowed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
11-Mar-2024 18:18:27
Order Date – 29 February 2024
Parties: M/s Ceramic Tableware Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) Customs Commissionerate Jodhpur Hqrs. at Jaipur, Jaipur
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s Ceramic Tableware Pvt. Ltd., had imported four consignments of Calcium Phosphate classifying under Chapter 25 which were cleared by the Customs Authorities. On inspection, it was alleged that they have mis-declared the HSN Code due to clerical error and agreed to pay the differential amount of duty.
- The appellant made an application under Section 149 of the Act to amend relevant Bill of Entries and The adjudicating authority rejected the application observing that mis-declaration has not been revealed suo-moto by the appellant but had been revealed pursuant to the search conducted and Director accepted the mis-declaration of HSN Code due to clerical error.
Issue –
- Whether Bill of Entries be amended under Section 149 where the mis-declaration has not revealed suo-moto by the appellant?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that the provisions of section 149 of the Act had been the subject matter of consideration in various decisions and it has been consistently held that amendment of the bill of entry is permissible under section 149 of the Customs Act even after the goods have been cleared for home consumption provided the said amendment is based on documentary evidence which was in existence at the time when the goods were cleared.
- Soon after detection on 26.11.2020, the appellant paid the differential duty along with interest and penalty on 4.12.2020 without any protest. From the nature of amendment sought by the appellant in Bills of Entry, the same is liable to be allowed since only a paper declaration was sought for amending the Customs Tariff Heading from 25 to 28.
- In the circumstances, it would well be considered as a mistake which has been rectified at the first available opportunity and therefore there is no error in allowing the application made by the appellant under section 149 of the Act seeking amendment of the bill of entries. In so far as the element of duty, interest and penalty is concerned the same having been paid and satisfied without any protest, the application made for consequent amendment of the bill of entry needs to be allowed.
- The appeal is, accordingly allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation