Customs – Cestat New Delhi: If the Bank officials despite verification are not able to detect the fraudulent nature of the documents, how can one expect from CHA who is not even a public official, hence no penalty can be imposed under Section 114 of the Customs Act,1962 – Appeals allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
18-May-2023 17:18:33
Order Date – 10 May 2023
Parties: M/S KVS Cargo, HIM Logistics Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner Customs (Export), New Delhi
Facts –
- The Appellants, M/S KVS Cargo, HIM Logistics Pvt Ltd, Customs Brokers were alleged to be involved in making fraudulent export of readymade garments with M/s Anand Enterprises.
- On an investigation it was found that M/s Anand Enterprises was not found existing on the declared address
- Penalty under Section 114 and/or 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 was imposed on both the appellants.
Issue –
- Whether the imposition of penalty under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 is in order?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that the allegations of forging the documents is solely on Anand Sharma and no connivance of the appellant in that regard has been pointed out by the Department. The statement of Shri Bal Kishan Bhalla Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank specifically verified and confirmed the documents produced in original.
- If the Bank officials despite verification are not able to detect the fraudulent nature of the documents, how can one expect from CHA who is not even a public official to unearth the dubious plan of the exporter. Hence no penalty can be imposed on M/s KVS Cargo and, therefore, the impugned order is set aside.
- M/s Him Logistics was merely a facilitator in forwarding Anand Sharma to KVS Cargo, hence they cannot be roped in for any violation of the provisions of CBLR and therefore the penalty imposed on M/s Him Logistics by the impugned order is untenable.
- Both the appeals are allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation