Excise – Allahabad High Court: Issue whether refund is allowed of unutilized Krishi Kalyan Cess – Held as the matter is pending before Apex Court, Tribunal either could have decided the issue on merits or retain the matter, but cannot remand it back - Directed to decide the matter keeping all contentions raised by both the sides before this Court – Writ petition disposed of [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
13-Feb-2023 13:08:28
Order Date – 07 January 2023
Parties: M/S AIA ENGINEERING LTD. Vs UNION OF INDIA
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/s AIA Engineering Ltd., is engaged in the business of manufacture of machinery and parts There were unutilised Cenvat credit of Krishi Kalyan Cess (KKC) aggregating Rs.43,61,383/- was recorded in the Cenvat register and the returns at the time of implementing GST.
- The refund claim was rejected by the Tribunal and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer that the pending matter before the Apex Court being a case of M/s. Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Company Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise has no applicability.
Issue –
- Whether the Tribunal is justified in remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer?
Order –
- The divisional bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that the matter is still pending before the Apex Court and has not been finally decided. The approach of the Tribunal to abdicate its duty of deciding the matter on the merits or to retain the matter till the outcome of the pending matter before the Apex Court.
- It was held that the very issue was decided by this Court in in case of Commissioner, Central GST and Central Excise Vadodara-II vs. M/s.Meghmani Finchem Ltd., by strongly disapproving this approach on the part of the Tribunal as “Dispensation of justice is not number games and should not be brought down to mere statistics. This disposal is also not final and is open to reopening of all the issues. This would lead to multiplicity of proceedings.”
- Thus, it is appropriate that the Tribunal, which is otherwise required to decide the matter on merit, shall decide the same keeping all contentions raised by both the sides before this Court and before the Tribunal open for them to agitate, let the same be decided without further loss of time.
- Writ petition is disposed of.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation