Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Appellant has already paid the excise duty/ Cenvat on the clearances of goods on which the demand was raised, hence there is no case of demand under Rule 6(3) – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
11-Feb-2023 13:13:09
Order Date – 09 February 2023
Parties: Posco Poggenamp Electrical Steel Pvt Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Vadodara-i
Facts –
- The Appellant, Posco Poggenamp Electrical Steel Pvt Limited, is engaged in manufacturing of excisable goods i.e. Parts of Transformer" and "CRGO Core Lamination" and also engaged in the trading of goods which is a declared service in terms of Section 66E(a) of the Finance Act, 1994.
- During the audit it was found that the appellant has traded the goods which is deemed exempted service and accordingly the appellant is liable to pay 6% / 7% of the value of exempted goods in terms of Rule 6(3)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
Issue –
- Whether the appellant had availed Cenvat credit on goods which is deemed exempted?
Order –
- The Tribunal held that from the records it is clear that the appellant has paid the excise duty/ Cenvat on the clearances on which the demand was raised in the present case. Hence there is no case of demand under Rule 6(3)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
- However, both the lower authorities on flimsy ground that as details were not given by the appellant, confirmed the demand. The Revenue is at liberty to verify calculation of payment and / or reversal of Cenvat in respect of inputs cleared as such and clearances on which no Cenvat credit was availed.
- Hence the appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation