Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Cenvat credit is not eligible in respect of EC and SHEC paid by the 100% EOU - Malafide intention cannot be attributed to the employee, as he is not beneficiary of any wrong doing by the Company, hence penalty is not leviable on employee [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
17-Jan-2023 19:16:41
Order Date – 16 January 2023
Parties: Hubergroup India Pvt Ltdand Shri Suresh Nair Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman
Facts –
- The Appellant, Hubergroup India Pvt Ltd and Shri Suresh Nair (Employee), were issued with a show casue notice denying Cenvat credit in respect of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess paid by the 100% EOU.
- The appellant had already reversed the Cenvat Credit of Education Cess prior to show cause notice.
Issues –
- Whether the show cause notice issued after reversing the Cenvat credit is in order?
Order –
- The Tribunal held that on perusal of the show cause notice it can be seen that the demand of Cenvat Credit is not only in respect of basic Excise duty but also of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess. Therefore, in this fact it cannot be said that the order denying the Cenvat credit on Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess is travelling beyond the scope of show cause notice. Hence, the demand was rightly made by the adjudicating authority.
- It was also held that the issue of correct calculation of Cenvat Credit on the invoice issued by the 100% EOU was always in dispute, therefore, malafide cannot be attributed to the employee of the Company in the facts of the present case. Moreover, he is not beneficiary of any wrong doing by the Company.
- Hence the penalty Shri. Suresh Nair employee of the Company cannot be imposed under Rules 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Hence, penalty on Shri. Suresh Nair is not sustainable, accordingly, set aside.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation