Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: In Pepsico judgement it was held that services used in setting up the factory are, unambiguously covered as 'input services' hence Cenvat credit is allowed - Matter remanded back to pass decision in light of the case law [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
14-Jan-2023 12:56:48
Order Date – 11 January 2023
Parties: CSCI Steel Corporation India Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E-Bharuch
Facts –
- The Appellant, CSCI Steel Corporation India Pvt Ltd are engaged in manufacture of steel, coils. The appellants were setting up their new plants and while setting up their new plant, the appellant availed various services.
- Input credit of various services used by the appellant was denied on the ground that the definition of input service was amended with effect from 01.04.2011 to exclude the services used for setting up of factory premises of output service provider or office relating to such factory or premises.
Issue –
- Whether the services are valid input services within the meaning of Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 during the period 2012-14?
Order –
- The Tribunal held that the impugned order does not examine the admissibility of Cenvat Credit of these services in the main part of the definition, but relies solely on the changes made in the inclusive part of definition. In terms of the decision in the case of Pepsico India Holdings (Pvt.) Ltd it is apparent that if the services provided in relation to setting up in unit would be covered under the main part of the definition. Unless specifically excluded by exclusion clause.
- It is seen that the impugned order does not examine which service would fall under which exclusion clause. The order in this regard is vague and not a speaking order. Hence the matter is remanded to the original Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation