Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Issue of allowance of interest on exports till the utilization of credit - Held refund claim prima facie appears to be the amount out of the fresh credit availed after the utilization of transferred credit, and thus rejected by Department - Matter remanded back to verify the documents [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
01-Mar-2024 05:35:57
Order Date – 28 February 2024
Parties: Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Surat-I
Facts –
- The Appellant, Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited, made a refund claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for the period April-2011 to June -2011 was rejected on the ground that the refund amount is out of the cenvat credit which was transferred from Hazira Pipe Mill Ltd and Hazira Plate Ltd on account of amalgamation and merger and the said credit was not attributed to the input used in the manufacture of exported goods.
Issue –
- Whether refund of unutilized cenvat credit accumulated is available on account of amalgamation and merger with SEZ unit?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that from the chart presented by the appellant it prima facie shows that the refund claim for the period April 2011 to June, 2011 appears to be the amount out of the fresh credit availed after the utilization of transferred credit. However, the details given in the chart along with documents were not verified by both the lower authorities.
- As regard the claim of interest firstly the same is consequential to the eligibility of refund in the facts of the present case. Secondly, the claim of interest also needs to be considered independently, therefore, the entire matter needs to be remitted back to the original adjudicating authority.
- Appeal is allowed by way of remand to the Adjudicating Authority.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation