Excise - CESTAT Ahmedabad: Service tax on Repair and Maintenance with regard to category of nozzles is payable after 16.05.2005; Not being aware of the law cannot be an excuse for non-payment of tax - Penalty under section 76 is leviable – Appeal partially allowed [Order attached dated 23 September,2022]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
27-Sep-2022 10:36:13
Key Pointers:-
- The Appellant, Kamal Industries submits that there was no tax liability on services of Repairs and Maintenance before 16.06.2005.
- Subsequently, the Law was amended, the service of Repair and Maintenance became taxable irrespective if there is any contactor not.
- It was submitted that without any malafide intention the service tax payment was escaped as were not aware about the change in law.
- Appellant relied on Lal Singh v/s CCE and ST Meerut and also relied in the decision of National Securites Depository Ltd. v/s CST observing that the appellant is eligible for cum-tax benefit
- Appellant submits that he is not subject to penalties imposed under section 76, 78 and 80 of Finance Act,1994relying on Raval TradingCompany case.
- The Tribunal observed that levying of service tax on Repair and maintenance service is payable after 16.05.2005. In the present case, the period is involved in 2006-07 and 2008-09.
- The Tribunal didn't agree to the contention of Appellant submitting that he didn't know the law as Ignorance of law is no excuse and the appellant had not even made a registration nor filed any returns.
- Relying on National Securites Depository Ltd. the Tribunal observed that Appellant is entitled for cum-taxbenefit. Further, simultaneous penalties under Section 76 and 78 cannot be imposed, thus the appellant is not liable for penalty under Section 76
- The Appeal is partly allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation