Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: The prices declared by appellant cannot be reviewed without any evidence that there was a flow back of money between the appellant and related buyers; As submission made by the appellants and judicial decisions relied upon by the appellant were not considered hence case is remanded back to reconsider – Appeal allowed by way of remand [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
15-Jan-2023 15:41:20
Order Date – 13 January 2023
Parties: Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Surat-ii
Facts –
- The Appellant, Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd is a 100% EOU and cleared their excisable goods to their sister concern units on payment of duty as DTA sale.
- The appellant & their sister concern units & other related units were falling under the definition of related person as defined in sub rule 2 of Rule 2 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. It was found that the price of the clearance made to sister concern units & other related units appears to have influenced and the price was not the sole consideration in such transaction in as much as the difference in value was huge.
Issues –
- Whether the sale made to sister concern is to be valued as per Rule 3 to 9 of Customs Valuation Rules?
Order –
- The Tribunal find that neither the show cause notice issuing authority nor the adjudicating authority have given reasons to hold that how the relation has indeed affected the price. The declared prices cannot be reviewed without any evidence to the effect that the relation between the appellant and the related buyer which has influenced the declared price or to the effect that there was a flow back of money between the appellant and related buyers.
- The Tribunal observed that difference in commercial levels, quantity levels was totally ignored by the Learned Commissioner. Further submission made by the appellants and judicial decisions relied upon by the appellant before him was not considered.
- Hence the appeal is allowed by way of remand.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation