Excise – Cestat Bangalore: Though there is a slight discrepancy in the description in invoices, but no discrepancy pointed out regarding the stock of raw material and the return submitted for job work by the Appellant, hence no reason to deny CENVAT credit – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
14-Feb-2023 15:50:04
Order Date – 13 February 2023
Parties: M/s Sahney Commutators Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner Of Central Tax, Bengaluru South
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s Sahney Commutators Pvt Ltd, is manufacturing Commutators and Bare Copper Strip/wire of various sizes are the major input for the manufacture final products. Some defective raw materials were return to supplier without reversing the CENVAT credit and instructed them to return on Job work basis.
- Based on an audit a show cause notice was issued alleging that the appellant had irregularly availed CENVAT credit of Rs.57,636/-.
Issue –
- Whether the appellant had correctly availed CENVAT credit?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that though, there is a slight discrepancy in the description in invoices, it is an admitted fact that Copper of 1028.8 Kgs were supplied by suppliers, it was returned for Job work due to defect and on completion of Job work, it is sent back to the appellant for further processing vide Invoice dated 03.02.2017 by charging only the labour charges.
- During investigation there is no discrepancy pointed out regarding the stock of raw material maintained by the appellant and the return submitted for the relevant period shows proper transaction of said material as claimed by the appellant.
- The Tribunal held that there is no reason to allege that the appellant had availed ineligible CENVAT credit. Hence, the appeal is allowed with consequential relief.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation