Excise – Cestat Chandigarh: Once goods are supplied against proper cenvatable invoice, buyer cannot go beyond that and verify whether registered dealer had purchased the goods legally – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
13-Feb-2023 17:48:32
Order Date – 31 January 2023
Parties: Munjal Kiriu Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE & ST- Gurugram
Facts –
- The Appellant, Munjal Kiriu Industries Pvt. Ltd., are engaged in the manufacture of automobile parts.
- A show cause notice was issued to the appellant alleging that the Director General of Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI) booked a case against various Central Excise registered units, managed by one person namely, Shri Amit Gupta. It was found that they were passing cenvat credit fraudulently without accompanying the goods to various manufacturing units as well as other registered dealers.
Issue –
- Whether the appellant is rightly availed Cenvat credit?
Order –
- The Tribunal held that the appellant has produced sufficient records in the form of invoices along with transport documents and other records showing the receipt of raw material/input register, RG23A Part-I and also the proof of payment through the banking channel.
- From the statement of Accountant of M/s AI and Excise in-charge of M/s M/A that they have actually supplied the goods to the appellant which was used by him in or in relation to the manufacture of the goods. Both the authorities below have not considered the documentary evidence produced by the appellant to prove his case.
- The Tribunal relied on the decision in in Luxmi Metal Industries vs. CCE-2013 (287) ELT 487, it was held that once goods are supplied against proper cenvatable invoice, buyer cannot go beyond that and verify whether registered dealer had purchased the goods legally.
- Hence the appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation