Excise – Cestat Kolkata: When branch offices of foreign service providers obtained registration and discharged Service Tax in India on the transaction, the service recipient located in India is not required to discharge the same on reverse charge – Limitation period is not applicable on tax paid by mistake, hence refund allowed - Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
15-Mar-2023 13:16:00
M/s. Oil India Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax Dibrugarh
Order Date – 14 March 2023
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s. Oil India Limited, is engaged in the exploration and production of Crude Oil and Natural Gas. The Appellant entered into arrangements with two foreign entities (NOMC and Haliburton), incorporated abroad for the receipt of certain services. They filed refund claim for the amount paid on the aforesaid transaction.
- A show cause notice dated 12.04.2017 was issued proposing to reject its claim alleging that the appellant failed the bar of unjust enrichment. It was also alleged that there was no evidence of double payment and in any event the refund claim filed was time barred.
Issue –
- Whether the appellant is entitled to refund?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that NOMC and Haliburton setup establishments in Jodhpur and Bombay respectively, obtained Service Tax registrations and discharged Service Tax. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Nagarjuna Oil Corporation Ltd. vs. CCE Puducherry [2017 (47) S.T.R. 96 (Tri. Chennai)] wherein it was held that when branch offices of foreign service providers obtained registration and discharged Service Tax in India on the transaction in question, the service recipient located in India (the assessee in that case) was not required to discharge the same on reverse charge.
- Hence the Appellant was not required to discharge Service Tax on reverse charge on the said transaction and it did so under a mistake of law. It was held in many judgments that amounts paid under mistaken notions would not be hit by the statutory limitation period.
- It is also clear that the amounts have not been expensed out as the appellant is awaiting the outcome of the litigation. Hence the amount of Service Tax paid cannot be said to have been passed on to anyone. It was also found that Service Tax paid by the Appellant never formed part of the crude oil sold by the Appellant.
- Hence the appeal is allowed and the appellant shall be entitled to refund amount along with interest.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation