Excise – New Delhi High Court: Dispute in claiming area based exemption – Held that the condition to claim exemption that unit was availing such exemption immediately before the 01.07.2017 cannot be alleged to have not met, as the Petitioner asserted their claim since inception for such exemption and subsequently the same has also flowed to them – Petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
04-Feb-2023 14:38:48
Order Date – 31 January 2023
Parties: M/s Special Cables Pvt Ltd Vs Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs & ORS
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/s Special Cables Pvt Ltd, was entitled to Area Based Exemption from Central Excise in terms of the Notification No.50/2003-CE dated 10.06.2003 from the date of commencement of production at its unit in Rudrapur, Uttarakhand till 01.07.2017.
- The respondents have denied the budgetary support under the Scheme to the petitioner on the ground that it did not fulfil the criteria of an ‘Eligible unit’ under the Scheme as it was not availing the Area Based Exemption under the Notification.
Issue –
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to Area Based Exemption in terms of the Notification No.50/2003-CE dated 10.06.2003?
Order –
- The Hon’ble High Court observed that Scheme indicates that for a unit to qualify as an eligible unit’, it is required to satisfy two conditions. First that it was eligible before first date of July 2017 to avail the benefit of ab initio exemption or exemption by a refund for payment of central excise duty in terms of notification as specified in paragraph 2 of the Scheme. And, second, that the unit was availing such exemption immediately before 01.07.2017. In the present case, there is no dispute that the petitioner was eligible to avail the benefits of the Notification (Notification No.50/2003-CE dated 10.06.2003), which was one of the Notifications as mentioned in paragraph 2 of the Scheme.
- It was held that that the second limb of the condition of exemption is that the unit must be availing the benefit of the Notifications as mentioned in paragraph 2 of the Scheme immediately prior to 01.07.2017. The petitioner was denied the benefit at the material time, cannot be read to mean that the petitioner was not availing the same. Thus there is no other reason for denying the petitioner’s claim for budgetary support under the Scheme.
- The Court directed the respondents to release the budgetary support amount as assessed to the petitioner in terms of the Scheme and to grant registration to the petitioner to enable it to file online claims as prayed for by the petitioner.
- The Appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation