FTP – Madras High Court: Central Government is competent to issue regulations for foreign trade - The alleged signature of the Director General of Foreign Trade made pursuant to the application of powers under Administrative Law shall not invalidate the Notification – Petition dismissed [Order attached]

                Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
                     Indirect tax updates  - 
6 months @299  / 1 Year @499  only
 Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases  - 
6 months @1199  / 1 Year @1999  only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
03-Apr-2023 16:30:39
Order date – 23 March 2023
Parties – M/s. M.R.Impex Vs The Union of India & Anr
Facts –
- The petitioner, M/s.M.R.IMPEX , is an Assessee under the Income Tax Act and conducts business of importing Poppy Seeds from China and Turkey.
 - The petitioner contends that the amendment to the Import Policy Condition No.3 of Chapter 12 of ITC (HS) 2012 - Schedule I (Import Policy) is without jurisdiction as the Director General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) is not the competent authority to issue the amendment Notification.
 - The petitioner claims that the Central Government alone is the authority to issue the Gazette Notification, which is impugned in the writ petition.
 
Issue –
- Whether the Director General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) is the competent authority to issue the amendment Notification?
 
Order –
- The Court held that the Central Government is competent to issue regulations for foreign trade under Section 3 (1) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulations) Act, 1992, and that the impugned amendment was issued by the Central Government in exercise of its powers under the Act.
 - It observed that the alleged signature of the Director General of Foreign Trade made pursuant to the application of powers under Administrative Law shall not invalidate the Notification, which is otherwise issued pursuant to Section 3 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulations) Act, 1992.
 - The Court held that the delegation of powers to the Director General of Foreign Trade was made for the smooth functioning of the Central Government Administration and that the grounds raised by the petitioner are untenable.
 - Thus, the Court found no infirmity in respect of the amendment issued to the Foreign Trade Policy and dismissed the writ petition.
 
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
             
              Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation