GST – AAR Gujarat: As Application for advance ruling was not filed by the actual supplier of the services but was filed by Chartered Accountant in his own name, hence application dismissed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
07-Apr-2023 21:04:08
Order Date – 31 March 2023
Facts –
- The Applicant, Kalepsh Dineshbhai Patel on behalf of M/s. Khanepe Hungermall LLP filed this application. M/s. Khanepe is not registered under GST.
- M/s. Khanepe is providing hostel facility to students undergoing graduation/post-graduation and master degree courses. They are also providing food directly to the students studying in different Universities. Students, stay at the premises of applicant by paying monthly rent, which includes both accommodation charges as well as food charges.
Issue –
- Whether GST is applicable to the services provided by the applicant?
Order –
- The AAR observed that the application is not filed by M/s. Khanepe Hungermall LLP, but by the Chartered Accountant in his own name. Since the person who has applied [M/s. Kalepsh Dineshbhai Patell is not the person who proposes to undertake the supply, the question of giving an advance ruling in the matter simply does not arise.
- Further ruling, even if given to the person who has filed the application, will not be binding on M/s. Khanepe in terms of section 103, ibid. The application is not accompanied by the requisite fee in terms of section 97(1), ibid read with Rule I 04 of the CGST Rules, 2017. The same was admitted by the applicant on personal hearing.
- Hence the application stands rejected in terms of section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with sections 95(a), (c) and 1 03 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation