GST – Allahabad High Court: Being an inter-state supply, no penalty is payable as the Petitioner were not liable to be taxed under the U.P. G.S.T. Act for not carrying the E-way bill: Petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
06-Aug-2022 01:36:50
Order date – 27 July 2022
Facts –
- The Petitioner, H.B.L. Power Systems Ltd, is involved in the business of manufacturing, sale, supply and installation of renewable energy systems, batteries etc in the state of UP.
- Modern Coach Factory, Raebareli, which is a Government of India undertaking, has placed purchase order upon the Hyderabad Office of the petitioner on 27.12.2017 for purchase of Battery Sets etc. The said supply was to be made in four lots.
- The Petitioner for obtaining E-way bill, uploaded details on the portal of the G.S.T. and generated the E-way bill for the goods.
- When the goods reached at Lucknow, it was intercepted by Commercial Tax Department on 08.03.2018 and a seizure order in purported exercise of powers under Section 129 (1) of the U.P. G.S.T. Act.
- The State was of the view that once the Central Government had suspended its E-way bill, the requirement of the State E-way bill stood revived automatically and as the petitioner was not carrying the State E-way bill, the seizure order came to be passed.
- Aggrieved the petitioner filed the petition.
Issue –
- Whether the seizure order passed by the department is maintainable?
Order –
- The High court observed that the whole basis based upon which the order has been passed that the petitioner was not carrying the E-way bill as are required under the U.P. G.S.T. Rules, looses significance, as the petitioner were not liable to be taxed under the U.P. G.S.T. Act being an inter-state supply
- Further, the requirement of E-way bill was recommended to be not enforced till 31st March, 2018, in view of the recommendation of the G.S.T. Council.
- Thus, on both the reasonings, the demand as raised in the order dated 19.03.2018 were not sustainable and were set aside.
- Thus the writ petition was allowed with directions to refund the 10% amount deposited by the petitioner while preferring the appeal, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from today. The bank guarantee given by the petitioner shall also be released to him.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation