GST – Allahabad High Court: Ex-parte order passed solely based on the SIB report, without any evidence and without granting the petitioner any opportunity of hearing is not enough to assess and levy tax, hence the Order is set aside – Petition allowed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
16-Apr-2023 14:36:04
Order date – 12 April 2023
Parties – M/S Lari Almira House Vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Facts –
- The petitioner, M/S LARI ALMIRA HOUSE, had claimed input tax credit for the financial year 2017-18 in accordance with the law.
- An inspection was carried out by the Deputy Commissioner (SIB), Commercial Tax, Gorakhpur on 20.04.2018, and a Panchanama was prepared in pursuance of the inspection.
- Subsequently, summons were issued to the petitioner under Section 70 of the Act and the petitioner appeared and filed a reply.
- After about three years on 02.09.2021, the petitioner was served with a show cause notice under section 74 of the U.P.G.S.T. Act based on the SIB survey report.
- The petitioner was not supplied with a copy of the SIB report.
- An ex-parte order came to be passed on 24.01.2022 solely based upon the SIB report.
Issue –
- Whether the impugned order passed by the adjudicating authority is in accordance with the law?
Order –
- The Court observed that an ex-parte order was passed against the petitioner on 24.01.2022 solely based on the SIB report, without granting the petitioner any opportunity of hearing.
- The power of search and seizure is conferred by Section 67 of the Act, while the power of scrutiny of returns filed is conferred upon the proper officer under Section 61 of the Act. These sections are steps towards initiating proceedings under Section 73 or Section 74 of the Act, which require establishing evasion of tax through prescribed procedures.
- Mere discrepancies found during scrutiny of returns or inspection are not enough to assess and levy tax; they must be corroborated with materials such as evidence.
- The department must provide an opportunity of hearing to the assessee under Section 75(4) of the Act, and any document proposed to be relied upon must be provided to the assessee prior to conclusion of proceedings.
- The order is quashed, and the matter is remanded to the adjudicating authority to pass a fresh order after supplying the copy of the SIB report, giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and an opportunity of filing a reply.
- Both writ petitions stand allowed in terms of the said order.
GST return filing consultant, PAN card application services, Tax planning advisor, Accounting and bookkeeping services, Business registration consultant, Company registration expert, Digital signature certificate (DSC) provider, Investment advisory services, Financial planning consultant, Tax compliance solutions, Tax consultant in Gurgaon, Tax preparation services, Small business accounting services
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation