GST – Allahabad High Court: Provision of Section 129(3) could not be invoked to subject godown premises to search and seizure operation – Directed concerned Commissioner to take appropriate action against officers misconduct, if any, to avoid such occurrences in future – Refund of deposit amount allowed together with interest @ 8% [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
10-Aug-2022 05:23:32
Order date – 06 August 2022
Facts –
- The petitioner, Mahavir Polyplast Pvt. Ltd. is a manufacturer of PVC pipes. They have approached this court after unsatisfactory results from other authorities. The present petition is against order dated 26.11.2019 passed by the Additional Commissioner Grade-2 confirming the penalty imposed under Section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act.
- The petitioner stores its raw materials and manufactured goods at a warehouse located on the same premises.
- On 07.08.2018, the business premises of the petitioner were subjected to a search and seizure operation by Special Investigation Branch of the Commercial Tax Department, Agra. Subsequently, a Panchnama dated 07.08.2018 was drawn alleging shortage of physical stock as compared to that recorded in the stock registers.
Issue –
- Whether imposing duty and penalty by an authority having no jurisdiction justifiable?
Order –
- The Court observed that the authorities of the Mobile Squad of Commercial Tax Department chose to act with negligence as the provision could not be invoked to subject a warehouse for search and seizure.
- The Court found out that they deliberately described the vehicle being checked as "UPGODOWN02" and "GODOWON" in the show cause notice issued dated 09.08.2018 by Assistant Commissioner (Mobile Squad), Unit-II Agra similarly in show cause notice issued dated 14.08.2018 by Assistant Commissioner (Mobile Squad)-5 Agra.
- The court held that the entire proceedings drawn up against it under Section 129(3) of the Act, are found to be without jurisdiction, hence the impugned order is quashed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation