GST – Allahabad High Court: Since there is no intention on the part of the dealer to evade tax except the wrong mention of part of registration number of the vehicle in the e-way bill; Minor discrepancy as to the registration of vehicle in State in the e-way bill would not attract proceedings for penalty – Writ petition allowed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
09-May-2024 10:14:49
Order Date – 12 April 2024
Parties: M/S Luminous Power Technologies Private Limited Vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/S Luminous Power Technologies Private Limited, was making a stock transfer from its unit at Saharanpur depot to a sale depot at Ghaziabad. The goods were being shifted accompanying delivery challan, e-way bill and bilty on 17.5.2018.
- The mobile squad on May 18, 2018 intercepted the goods and detained the vehicle in question along with the goods on the premise that in the e-way bill the vehicle number has been mentioned wrongly. Detention order was passed and penalty under Section 129(3) was imposed.
Issue –
- Whether the wrong mention of number of Vehicle in e-way bill would be considered as a human error?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that As there is no dispute to the fact that it is a case of stock transfer and there is no intention on the part of dealer to evade any tax, the minor discrepancy as to the registration of vehicle in State in the e-way bill would not attract proceedings for penalty under Section 129 and the order passed by the detaining authority as well as first appellate authority cannot be sustained.
- Moreover, the Department has not placed before the Court any other material so as to bring on record that there was any intention on the part of the dealer to evade tax except the wrong mention of part of registration number of the vehicle in the e-way bill. The number of vehicle through which the goods were transported was manually corrected by the transporter while only there is a minor discrepancy in Part-B of the e-way bill where the description of the vehicle is entered by the dealer.
- Writ petition is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation