GST – Andhra Pradesh High Court: The petitioner cannot be said to have deprived of the claim of input tax credit as a consequence of not submitting Form GST ITC-02 electronically - Petitioner is directed to approach the authority and file the objections with evidence – Writ petition dismissed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
01-Dec-2023 06:30:28
Order Date – 09 November 2023
Parties: Tikona Infinet Private Limited Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh
Facts –
- The Petitioner, Tikona Infinet Private Limited (TIPL), entered into a Business Transfer Agreement (BTA), dated 17.08.2017 with Tikona Digital Networks (TDN).
- TDN intended to transfer unutilized credit in the electronic credit ledger of TDN on the date of slump sale to TIPL, but Form ITC-02 was not available on GSTN portal, and consequently, TDN was not able to transfer on GSTN portal and TIPL was unable to utilize the credit balance appearing in the electronic credit ledger of TDN. Thus, the petitioner/TIPL also submitted letter dated 12.02.2018 to the jurisdictional authority duly intimating about the transfer of ITC to TDN manually.
- A show cause notice was issued on the ground that the petitioner is claiming ITC in contravention of the provisions of Section 16 of the APGST Act 2017, also granting opportunity to file objections along with documentary evidence, as also providing personal hearing, if so desired.
- The petitioner without availing such opportunity filed the writ petition.
Issue –
- Whether the petitioner can challenge the show cause notice without responding the same?
Order –
- The Divisional Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that the petitioner should respond to the show cause notice raising all such objections, as may be raised before the authority issuing the show cause notice and in case any adverse order is passed and the petitioner feels aggrieved, the petitioner may then have recourse to the appropriate proceedings.
- In the present case, the petitioner has not been deprived from availing the input tax credit as of now, but the show cause notice has been issued granting opportunity. So, at this stage, it cannot be said that as a consequence of not submitting Form GST ITC-02 electronically, the petitioner has been deprived of the claim of input tax credit. The petitioner has the opportunity and on such opportunity on verification of such fact, the authority has yet to consider the petitioner’s claim of input tax credit.
- Thus, the court held that the petitioner should approach the authority which has issued the show cause notice and file the objections with evidence, and if so desire, to avail the opportunity of personal hearing with due intimation to the authority concerned.
- The Writ Petition is dismissed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation