GST – Bombay High Court: Commissioner (A) instead of directing the Petitioner to file an application for revocation of cancelled registration, has gone ahead and rejected the appeal on the ground of maintainability – Directed Petitioner to file an revocation application before the authority – Writ petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
07-Mar-2023 14:59:13
Order Date – 22 February 2023
Parties: M/s Mohankar Timber Company Vs The Union of India and ors.
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/s Mohankar Timber Company, was issued a show cause notice dated 7 January 2021 for cancellation of registration as Petitioner had not filed returns for a continuous period of six months. After considering the reply of the Petitioner, the Petitioner’s GSTIN registration was cancelled vide order dated 28 January 2021.
- The Commissioner (Appeals), rejected the appeal filed by Petitioner holding that since Petitioner did not approach the jurisdictional CGST authority for revocation of cancellation of registration under section 30 of the Act after issuance of the cancellation order as per the time lines provided under the law.
Issue –
- Whether the rejection of appeal is in order?
Order –
- The Divisional Bench of the Hon’ble High Court observed from the decisions of this court in MSK Electricals vs. The Union of India and Others, that in similar circumstances this court has granted an opportunity to the Petitioner to file an application before the authority under section 30 of the CGST Act.
- Although the authority observed that the appeal was filed within time and also went to the extent of allowing the appeal, however, instead of directing the Petitioner to file an application under section 30 it has gone ahead and rejected the appeal on the ground of maintainability.
- Therefore, the Court inclined to afford an opportunity to the Petitioner to file an application to the authority under section 30 of the CGST Act. Writ petition disposed of.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation