GST – Delhi High Court: Petitioner allowed to file Appeal for non-payment of interest on grant of refund- More than one year has elapsed, Petitioner cannot be denied interest as payable for the period of delay in refunding the amount due to the petitioner – Petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
16-May-2023 14:57:09
Order Date – 08 May 2023
Parties: Alex Tours and Travel Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner, CGST Division, Janakpuri
Facts –
- The Petitioner, Alex Tours and Travel Private Limited, filed refund applications, dated 13.04.2021 and 14.04.2021, claiming refund of unutilised Input Tax Credit, for the financial year 2018-19 and 2019-20
- The applications filed by the petitioner for refund of unutilised ITC were rejected, inter alia, on the ground that the services provided by the petitioner were intermediary services and did not qualify for export of services. The respondent also raised an issue regarding non-furnishing of Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate.
Issue –
- Whether the appellant is entitled to refund of unutilised Input Tax Credit?
Order –
- The Divisional Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that the petitioner has succeeded before the appellate authority, the respondent has not processed the petitioner’s claim for refund.
- The refund applications filed by the petitioner to seek implementation of the Orders-in-Original and the deficiency memos shall be treated as non est. The appellate authority has not granted any interest on the amount of refund due. However, more than one year has elapsed, the petitioner cannot be denied interest as payable for the period of delay in refunding the amount due to the petitioner.
- The present petition is allowed. The respondent is directed to forthwith disburse the petitioner’s claim for refund along with interest as payable in accordance with law.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation