GST – Gauhati High Court: Issuance of Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice without issuance of Form GST ASMT-10 is violation of statutory prescriptions contained in Section 61 and Section 73 of CGST Act - SCN stayed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
28-Dec-2023 09:40:14
Order Date – 13 December 2023
Parties: M/s PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt Ltd Vs The Union of India and 3 Ors, The Additional Commissioner, Superintendent and Principal Commissioner
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/s PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt Ltd, was served with a Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice dated 05.09.2023 alleging that there is an un[1]reconciled ITC as reflected in the GSTR-9C for the Financial Year: 2017-2018 and the petitioner is liable to reverse the wrongly availed and utilized ITC under Section 73[1] of the CGST Act, 2017 along with applicable interest under Section 50 of the CGST Act, 2017 and penalty under Section 73[9] of the CGST Act, 2017.
- It has been contended by the petitioner that the mandatory conditions precedent required for invoking the provisions of Section 73[1] of the CGST Act, 2017 for issuance of the impugned Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice are palpably absent in the case in hand.
Issue –
- Whether the Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice is issued properly?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that the alleged discrepancy would only be a discrepancy simplicitor but at the stage of issuance of Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice under Section 73[1] of the CGST Act, 2017, there is formation of a prima facie opinion on the part of the Proper Officer that there is an act, which is in violation of the statutory obligation cast on the noticee. Admittedly in the case in hand, the Form GST ASMT-10 was not issued to the petitioner.
- Further found that an act of issuance of the impugned Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice dated 05.09.2023 under Section 73[1] of the CGST Act, 2017 by the Proper Officer was without compliance of the mandatory conditions precedent, prescribed under the CGST Act, 2017 and the CGST Rules, 2017, more particularly, the provisions of Section 61 of the CGST Act, 2017 r/w Rule99 of the CGST Rules, 2017, to derive jurisdiction to issue such a Demand-cum- Show Cause Notice under Section 73[1] of the CGST Act, 2017.
- Thus the it is ordered that the operation of the impugned Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice shall remain stayed, till the returnable date.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation