GST – Kerala High Court: Proceedings for cancellation of registration is to be Initiated under Rule 21 and in form GST REG-17 and not in form GST REG-31 – As Ext.P issued in the wrong form, hence it is clearly vague, petitioner allowed to file all defaulted returns together with tax, late fee, interest, penalty once the registration was restored – Writ petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
29-Dec-2022 01:55:51
Order date – 22 December 2022
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/S. Pankaj Cottage was issued with Ext P.1 order on 04-04-2022 cancelling the registration granted under the CGST/SGST Acts, which never came to his attention.
- On coming to know of the order cancelling the registration, the petitioner applied for revocation, which was rejected by Ext.P3, finding that the application for revocation was beyond the time prescribed under Section 30 of the CGST/SGST Acts.
Issue –
- Whether the rejection of revocation application is in order?
Order –
- The Hon’ble High Court held that if the Officer wishes to initiate proceedings for cancellation of registration, he must issue a notice as specified in Rule 21 of the CGST Rules and in form GST REG-17 and not in form GST REG-31.
- Apart from the fact that Ext.P.5 is issued in the wrong form, it is also bad for the complete absence of any detail and it is clearly vague. The Court held that the provisions of Sections 29/30 of CGST/SGST which gives to the power to cancel registration and also to revoke it.
- Hence the writ petition is allowed. Ext.P1 stands quashed. The petitioner will be required to file all defaulted returns together with tax, late fee, interest, penalty etc., within a period of two weeks from the date on which the registration of the petitioner is restored
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation