GST - Madhya Pradesh High court: Wrong address mentioned in the E-way bill being a clerical mistake, only minor penalty can be levied; Appeal allowed by holding that no separate demand of additional tax and penalty can be imposed: Appeal allowed. [Order Attached dated 02 September 2022]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
08-Sep-2022 12:41:24
Order date – 02 September 2022
Facts –
- The Petitioner, MAHARAJA CABLES (C/O MAXWELL LOGISTIC PVT LTD), a private company engaged in the business of copper cables, entered into an agreement with one M/s Bajaj Electricals Ltd. for supply of certain goods.
- As per the agreement, the goods had to be delivered at the factory at Bhopal. The petitioner generated an E-way bill which is required to be carried along with the consignment.
- However, the address on the E-way bill was mentioned at registered office of the consignee at Indore, instead of Bhopal and thus, the Revenue Authorities initiated proceedings under Section 129 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 which ultimately resulted in passing of the order by which the liability of additional tax as well as penalty was imposed against the petitioner and the appeal against the said order was also dismissed.
- Petitioner submits that the mistake while generating E-way bill was an inadvertent human error and there was no intention to evade the tax liability.
- Therefore, the petition was being filed by the petitioner.
Issue –
- Whether the petitioners are liable to pay additional tax as well as penalty for a clerical mistake in e-way bill?
Order –
- The Court observed that the mistake in question is bonofide, therefore by invoking the principle of parity, directed that the impugned orders dated 05.09.2019 is quashed.
- Further, it was directed that the respondents will be at liberty to consider the case of the petitioner for imposition of a minor penalty, while treating the mistake in question, to be a clerical mistake as per Circular dated 14.09.2018 bearing No.CBEC/20/16/03/2017-GST, issued by Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
- Consequently, the writ petition was allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation