GST: Madras High Court - Petitioners are permitted for rectification of errors made in GSTR-1 for FY 2017-18 for wrong recipient GSTIN, missed reporting of invoices, IGST remitted under head of CGST and SGST etc., as there is no malafides attribute - The errors committed are clearly inadvertent and, the rectification would, in fact, enable proper reporting of the turnover and input tax credit to enable the claims – Writ Petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
17-Mar-2023 11:14:31
Order date: 09 March 2023
Parties: Deepa Traders V.S Principal Chief Commissioner Of GST and Central Excise and 2 others
Facts:
- The Petitioner, Deepa Traders, is a dealer in metal and steel scrap. The petitioner has in respect of the returns for a few months during the period 2017-18, admittedly, committed certain errors. The errors are of following nature.
- Recipients GSTIN/name has been wrongly mentioned.
- The invoice number/date have been wrongly mentioned.
- Supply details were correctly supplied in GSTR 3B and tax duly remitted. However, some of the invoice wise details have been omitted to be reported in Form GSTR 1.
- IGST was inadvertently remitted under the heads SGST and CGST.
- It was only in December, 2019 that the petitioner states that these errors came to light on account of the customers bringing the same to its attention.
- Thereafter an attempt was made to rectify the error however there was no mechanism set out under the act or in the portal to enable the same. Thus, the instant petition is filed.
Issue:
- Whether the Petitioner would be allowed to rectify the error committed in GSTR-1
Order:
- The Court observed that they have taken a view in very similar circumstances as in the present case, in the case of Sun Dye Chem V. Assistant Commissioner (2021 (44) GSTL 358) reiterated in Pentacle Plant Machineries Pvt. Ltd. V. Office of the GST Council, New Delhi (2021 (52) GSTL 129) to the effect that those petitioners must be permitted the benefit of rectification of errors where there is no malafides attributed to the assessee. The errors committed are clearly inadvertent and, the rectification would, in fact, enable proper reporting of the turnover and input tax credit to enable claims to be made in an appropriate fasion by the petitioner and connected assessees.
- Hence, the Court accepted the prayer of the petitioner and issued mandamus to the respondents to do the needful to enable uploading of the rectified GSTR 1.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation