GST – New Delhi High Court: Impugned order is unsustainable as it does not consider the Petitioner’s response to the Show Cause Notice - Directed Revenue to restore the Petitioner’s Registration – Petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
21-Feb-2023 14:58:23
Order Date – 09 February 2023
Parties: M/s Rakesh Enterprises Vs The Principal Commissioner Central Goods and Service Tax & Ors.
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/s Rakesh Enterprises, was issued with a show cause notice dated 15.12. 2020 alleging that the petitioner had defaulted in filing the returns for more than six months.
- Being aggrieved by the order dated 28.12,2020 whereby the petitioner’s registration under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was cancelled, the appeal has filed.
- The petitioner claimed that they had filed a reply to said notice on 24.12.2020, whereas the respondent states that the case history does not reflect that the petitioner had filed any response to the Show Cause Notice dated 15.12.2020.
Issue –
- Whether the cancellation of registration is in order?
Order –
- The divisional bench of Hon’ble High Court held that order dated 28.12.2020 refers to the petitioner’s response to the Show Cause Notice, it does not indicate as to the contents thereof or reflects any discussion in respect of the petitioner’s explanation.
- it is also relevant to note that there is no dispute that the petitioner has filed its returns, albeit belatedly, and has also paid the tax and penalty in accordance with the Act.
- It is not necessary to examine whether the time period as stipulated under Section 30 of the Act is mandatory in this case. This is because it is apparent that the impugned order dated 28.12.2020, cancelling the petitioner’s registration is unsustainable as it does not consider the petitioner’s response to the Show Cause Notice.
- Hence the appeal is allowed
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation