GST – New Delhi High Court: Issue of denial of IGST refund on export of goods due to claim of duty drawback – Held that the Circular only explains the provisions of drawback and it has nothing to do with the IGST refund - Directed Respondent to grant refund of IGST paid during the transitional period, after deducting the differential amount of duty drawback along with interest @ 7% p.a. [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
11-Oct-2022 11:48:42
Order date: 06 October 2022
Facts
- The Petitioner, M/S KISHAN LAL KURIA MAL INTERNATIONAL, was denied refund of IGST paid on export of goods, as Drawback was claimed at the higher rates under column A of the Drawback Schedule prescribed in the notification.
- Petitioners submitted that even though drawback rates prescribed in respect of goods exported were higher in column A (1%) than the rates prescribed in column B (0.15%), yet the rate at which IGST (18%) was paid on the goods exported was even much higher than the said rate in column A. Therefore, they did not have any benefit in claiming drawback under Column A at the cost of forgoing their IGST refund and the drawback was claimed under Column A because of the confusion and lack of technical knowledge prevalent during the transitional phase about working of the new indirect tax laws.
- Accordingly, petitioner seek directions to the respondents to grant refund of IGST paid on goods exported during the Transitional Period (July-September, 2017) after deducting the differential amount of duty drawback, along with appropriate interest on such refund from the date of the shipping bill till the date of actual refund.
- The Court relied on the judgment of Gujarat High Court in M/s Amit Cotton Industries v. Principal Commissioner of Customs, 2019 (29) G.S.T.L.200 (Guj.) wherein it was held that the circular is dated 9th October 2018, whereas the export took place on 27th July 2017. Over and above the same, the circular explains the provisions of the drawback and it has nothing to do with the IGST refund. Thus Rule 96 of the Rules, 2017, is very clear and the writ-applicant is entitled to claim the refund of the IGST.
- Hence, the Court held that since the facts in the present cases are pari materia to the case in M/s Amit Cotton Industries (supra), the present writ petitions are allowed directing the Respondent authorities to grant refund of IGST paid on the goods exported by the Petitioners during the transitional period, after deducting the differential amount of duty drawback along with appropriate interest at the rate of 7% p.a. on such refund from the date of the shipping bill till the date of actual refund.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation