GST – New Delhi High Court: Once the refund was sanction by the appellate authority it is not open for the respondents to raise further deficiency memos regarding the same – Writ petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
16-Jul-2023 22:28:08
Order Date – 07 July 2023
Parties: Advance Systems Vs The Commissioner of Central Excise and CGST
Facts –
- The Petitioner, Advance Systems, had filed two applications pertaining to the Zero Rated Supplies under Section 54(3)(i) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
- Although the petitioner filed the applications for refund (in Form GST RFD-01) on 20.04.2022; the respondent did not process the same within the stipulated period. After much delay, on 19.05.2022, the respondent issued a Show Cause Notice proposing denial of refund claimed by the petitioner on several grounds.
- The appellate authority partly sanctioned the refund claim of the petitioner. The petitioner had, once again, filed the claim for refund on the basis of the Orders-in-Appeal dated 31.01.2023. The respondent issued a deficiency memo merely stating that “supporting documents attached are incomplete”
Issue –
- Whether the petitioner is eligible to get refund amount or not?
Order –
- The Divisional Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that the petitioner was not required to make repeated applications for refund after it had prevailed in its appeals before the appellate authority. The appellate proceedings are a continuation of the petitioner’s applications for refund and, therefore, the Orders-in-Appeals were required to be implemented.
- After the petitioner had succeeded in its appellate proceedings, there is no question of the respondent now raising any deficiency or once again requiring the petitioner to furnish any undertaking or declaration which it had already done at the initial stage.
- Taxpayer is not required to make repeated applications for seeking a refund. Once a taxpayer has made a claim for refund, the same is required to be processed in accordance with law. If the refund is rejected for any reason and the said party prevails before the appellate authority,
- In view of the above, the petition is allowed. The respondent shall forthwith sanction the refund claim as preferred by the petitioner to the extent as accepted by the appellate authority along with applicable interest in accordance with the provisions of the CGST Act.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation