GST- Punjab and Haryana High Court: Interest allowed on refund of wrongly paid CGST and SGST, no reason to not pay the interest for 2-1/2 years – Petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
25-Feb-2023 09:34:40
Order Date – 06 January 2023
Parties: SBI CARDS & PAYMENT SERVICES LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Facts –
- The Petitioner, SBI CARDS & PAYMENT SERVICES LIMITED, wrongly paid CGST and SGST amounting to Rs.108.41 crores (approx.) and applied for a refund. But the concerned authorities rejected the same.
- Later, the court directed to refund the amount of Rs.108 crores (approx.) which was deposited by the petitioner along with applicable interest within a period of one month.
- But the respondents rejected the claim of interest on Rs.108.41 crores, hence the present petition has been filed.
Issue –
- Whether the Petitioner is eligible for interest?
Order –
- The Court observed that the additional amount of tax which was paid by the petitioner, was paid on the requirement of the respondents only. It was specifically observed that the said money had been lying with the respondents for 2½ years.
- The arguments raised by the petitioner are supported by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Union of India and others, and the decision adopted by this Court in M/s Dee Kay Exports Vs. Union of India and others, where this Court allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection of interest and holding that the respondents are liable to pay interest.
- The Court stated that the petitioner was entitled to a refund as well as an interest amount. Unfortunately, this has not been done and the respondents have no justification for withholding the interest amount, which is a negligent act.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation