GST – Punjab and Haryana High Court: State is only dilly-delaying on the issue and merely on account of the fact that the State is in the process of filing an appeal, the State is not justified in not refunding the amount to Petitioner – Writ petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
09-Nov-2023 22:34:43
Order Date – 31 October 2023
Parties: M/s Ganesh Steel (India) Vs State of Punjab & others
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/s Ganesh Steel (India), aggrieved by the denial of a refund by the State Tax Officer, on the ground that the Department is in the process of filing an appeal against the order has filed this petition.
- Accordingly, the refund application was recommended to be rejected.
Issue –
- Whether the denial of refund is proper where the department is in the process of filing an appeal against the order?
Order –
- The Divisional Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that2 while passing the impugned order that the writ petition first came up for hearing on 03.07.2023 and an opportunity was given to the State to submit whether an appeal had been filed or not. More time was taken on 21.07.2023 and 29.09.2023 and proceedings had been deferred. However, the appeal has still not been filed.
- Thus, it is clear that the State is only dilly-delaying on the issue and merely on account of the fact that the State is in the process of filing an appeal, the State is not justified in divesting the petitioner of his fruits of litigation which have accrued to him despite a period of 1 year 3 months having gone by.
- Hence the State is directed to refund the amount due within 2 weeks and when any order is passed in favour of the State in further proceedings, the said directions of refund would not stand in the way to recover the amount refunded.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation