Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Amount collected from customers against “activation charges” of equipment/ software features are covered under the activity of sales of goods and not covered under the provisions of “Service” - No suppression or mis-declaration can be attributed for invoking extended period of demand as the VAT is paid – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
09-Jul-2023 19:42:16
Order Date – 07 July 2023
Parties: Avaya Global Connect Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Ahmedabad
Facts –
- The Appellant, Avaya Global Connect, have collected activation charges in respect of telecom equipment EPABX system which was sold earlier.
- It was alleged that since activation of software activity was carried out after the sale of equipment, the same is liable for service tax under Business Auxiliary Service.
Issue –
- Whether activation charges for activating software is liable to service tax when the sales tax on the same activity was discharged?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that the in identical issue, only for the different period, has been decided vide order No. A/10004/2023 dated 04.01.2023 it was held that “it is clear that the amount collected by the Appellant from their customers against as “activation charges” of equipment/ software features are covered under the activity of sales of goods and not covered under the provisions of “Service” as defined in the Act. Therefore, we don’t find any merits in impugned order.”
- Further it was held in that case that “the appellant admittedly paid the Sales Tax/ VAT duty on the entire transaction and also issued invoice/bills to customer for the above disputed transactions. Accordingly, no suppression or mis-declaration can be attributed to the appellant for invoking extended period of demand. Accordingly, the demand for longer period is not sustainable on the ground of limitation also.”
- From the above, it can be seen that the facts and legal issue are identical to the present case therefore, the ratio of the above decision in the appellant’s own case is squarely applicable. Accordingly, following the above decision of this Tribunal, the appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation