Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Issue of valuation of compositive contract – Held that since the appellant have declared material cost and the same was accepted by the service recipient, no doubt can be raised that the material cost declared in the invoice is incorrect – Further, the appellant have paid the Service tax on much higher value, for this reason also the demand is absolutely unsustainable – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
27-Jan-2023 13:05:11
RAJ ENGINEERS Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-RAJKOT
Order date – 23 January 2023
Facts –
- The appellant, Raj Engineers having service tax registration, during 2005-2006 to 2008-2009 have provided composite contract service in Reliance Township Jamnagar.
- The appellant have paid service tax only on service portion deducting value of material supplied claiming the benefit granted under Notification No.12/03-ST dated 20.06.2003.
- The department proposing denial of benefit of Notification No. 12/03-ST dated 20.06.2003 and issued a show cause notice dated 01.09.2010 considering the gross value i.e. including cost of material and service provider.
Issue –
- Whether the demand on service tax is otherwise sustainable on the submission of the appellant that they are eligible for composite contract scheme alternatively abatement Notification No. 15/2004-ST and 01/2006-ST.
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that the limited issue to be decided in the facts of the present case is whether the appellant is eligible for exemption notification No. 12/03-ST which provides the abatement of value to the extent of material cost.
- Since the appellant have declared a material cost and the same was accepted by the service recipient, no doubt can be raised that the material cost declared in the invoice is incorrect unless is proved contrary by the department.
- The appellant have taken the abatement ranging from 30% to 48%. Thus, despite the availability of abatement as per the notification.
- The appellant have paid the service tax on much higher value, for this reason also the demand is absolutely unsustainable.
- Appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation